Technical Summary
The Repr-Digest and Content-Digest integrity fields are subject to
HTTP content coding considerations. There are some use cases that
benefit from the unambiguous exchange of integrity digests of
unencoded representation. The Unencoded-Digest and Want-Unencoded-
Digest fields complement existing integrity fields for this purpose.
This document updates the terms "Integrity fields" and "Integrity
preference fields" defined in RFC 9530.
Working Group Summary
There was quiet but broad agreement to adopt, followed by regular
check-ins and contributions, but the authors were most active. This
is to be expected given that this is a "boring" but important
exercise in creating a protocol element to fill a necessary hole.
Document Quality
The document has received positive reviews within the Working Group
and during Last Call. Feedback from SecDir and GenArt has been
incorporated in the most recent version.
Personnel
The Document Shepherd for this document is Mark Nottingham. The
Responsible Area Director is Mike Bishop.