Review request
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-info-model-11 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | 11 (document currently at 17) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | YANG Doctors (yangdoctors) | |
Deadline | 2017-07-31 | |
Requested | 2017-07-17 | |
Requested by | Susan Hares | |
Authors | Nitin Bahadur , Sriganesh Kini , Jan Medved | |
WG chairs | Susan Hares , Russ White | |
I-D last updated | 2018-09-26 | |
IESG document state | Became RFC 8430 (Informational) | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -08
by Ravi Singh
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -11 by Henning Rogge (diff) Opsdir Early review of -12 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff) Genart Last Call review of -14 by Peter E. Yee (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Paul Wouters (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff) |
|
Comments |
Please review this as a final QA review after WG LC and before publication. This document should be check to see it abides with the current guidelines for a data model under the revised data store guidelines. Chair urgent request for brief review prior to last call review from OPS-DIR, RTG-DIR, and YANG doctors. If the appropriate directorates could give advise to the chair, shepherd and authors in a brief first past review, we can go forward. As it is, this draft passed WG LC in June, and is stuck. Your gracious aid is appreciated. For Yang Doctors: This informational yang model did not recieve a Yang doctor's review for the informational model. The data model has received a yang doctor's review. These are synced. These are revised datastore models. Do the yang doctors want to see the following revised datastore guidelines followed: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines/. What is lacking in this informational model? |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ladislav Lhotka |
State | Withdrawn by team |
History
Date | By | Description |
---|