Mapping Characters in IDNA
draft-ietf-idnabis-mappings-05
Discuss
Yes
No Objection
No Record
Summary: Needs a YES. Has a DISCUSS.
Lars Eggert (was No Objection) Discuss
Section 1., paragraph 2: > It should be noted that this document does not specify the behavior > of a protocol that appears "on the wire". It describes an operation > that is to be applied to user input in order to prepare that user > input for use in an "on the network" protocol. As unusual as this > may be for an IETF protocol document, it is a necessary operation to > maintain interoperability. We can probably clear this discuss up before the call. Why is this document going for Informational? If the prodecure in Section 2 is required for interoperability, shouldn't it be on the standards track? Also, because it is likely that future documents will have to have normative references to this procedure.
Section 4., paragraph 0: > acts on the indvidual labels of the domain name. If an Nit: s/indvidual/individual/
Alvaro Retana No Record
Andrew Alston No Record
Erik Kline No Record
Francesca Palombini No Record
John Scudder No Record
Martin Duke No Record
Murray Kucherawy No Record
Paul Wouters No Record
Robert Wilton No Record
Roman Danyliw No Record
Warren Kumari No Record
Zaheduzzaman Sarker No Record
Éric Vyncke No Record
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) Yes
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection