Skip to main content

Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP: Implementation Report
draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation-00

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
00 (System) Notify list changed from draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation.ad@ietf.org, russ@riw.us, idr-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation.shepherd@ietf.org to (None)
2015-08-06
00 (System) Document has expired
2015-07-24
00 Alvaro Retana The idr WG is now documenting implementation reports in their Wiki.  This draft is the first to go through that process.

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/idr/trac/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-add-paths%20implementations
2015-07-24
00 Alvaro Retana IESG state changed to Dead from Publication Requested
2015-05-20
00 Alia Atlas Shepherding AD changed to Alvaro Retana
2015-05-13
00 Jonathan Hardwick Request for Early review by RTGDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Mach Chen.
2015-04-27
00 Jonathan Hardwick Request for Early review by RTGDIR is assigned to Mach Chen
2015-04-27
00 Jonathan Hardwick Request for Early review by RTGDIR is assigned to Mach Chen
2015-04-10
00 Alvaro Retana Shepherding AD changed to Alia Atlas
2015-04-10
00 Amy Vezza
1. Summary

The document shepherd is Russ White. The responsible Area Director is Alvaro
Retana.

This document documents the current implementation state for a set …
1. Summary

The document shepherd is Russ White. The responsible Area Director is Alvaro
Retana.

This document documents the current implementation state for a set of
extensions to BGP so a BGP speaker can advertise multiple paths rather than
a single best path to peers. These additional paths are intended to used to
eliminate path oscillation, in a number of situations where advertising
multiple paths can improve network convergence, and in a number of
situations where BGP is used in "high fan out" equal cost multipath network
topologies to provide optimal path availability.

2. Review and Consensus

There has been no controversy over this document, which simply indicates how
many implementations of these extensions there are, and which specific
capabilities have been included in those implementations. The document shows
widespread implementation of the features described.

The working group has reached concensus on moving this document forward.

3. Intellectual Property

Each author has confirmed conformance with BCP 78/79. There are no IPR
disclosures on the document.

4. Other Points

There are no normative downrefs in this document. There are no additions to
the YANG model based on the extensions described in this draft. There are no
changes to any IANA registry as a result of this draft.
2015-04-10
00 Amy Vezza IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2015-04-10
00 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for /doc/draft-retana-idr-add-paths-implementation/
2015-04-10
00 Amy Vezza Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication
2015-04-09
00 Susan Hares Notification list changed to "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com.>, "Russ White" <russ@riw.us> from "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com.>
2015-04-09
00 Susan Hares Document shepherd changed to Russ White
2015-04-06
00 Susan Hares IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2015-04-06
00 Susan Hares Notification list changed to "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com.>
2015-04-06
00 Susan Hares Document shepherd changed to Susan Hares
2015-04-06
00 Susan Hares Intended Status changed to Informational from None
2015-02-02
00 Susan Hares This document now replaces draft-retana-idr-add-paths-implementation instead of None
2015-02-02
00 Alvaro Retana New version available: draft-ietf-idr-add-paths-implementation-00.txt