%% You should probably cite rfc9294 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-04, number = {draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-04}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr/04/}, author = {Ketan Talaulikar and Peter Psenak and Jeff Tantsura}, title = {{Application-Specific Attributes Advertisement with BGP Link-State}}, pagetotal = 13, year = 2020, month = nov, day = 15, abstract = {Various link attributes have been defined in link-state routing protocols like OSPF and IS-IS in the context of the MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE) and GMPLS. BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) extensions have been defined to distribute these attributes along with other topology information from these link-state routing protocols. Many of these link attributes can be used for applications other than MPLS-TE or GMPLS. Extensions to link-state routing protocols have been defined for such link attributes that enable distribution of their application- specific values. This document defines extensions to BGP-LS address- family to enable advertisement of these application-specific attributes as a part of the topology information from the network.}, }