%% You should probably cite rfc9294 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-09,
    number =    {draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-09},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr/09/},
    author =    {Ketan Talaulikar and Peter Psenak and Jeff Tantsura},
    title =     {{Application-Specific Attributes Advertisement with BGP Link-State}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2022,
    month =     apr,
    day =       15,
    abstract =  {Various link attributes have been defined in link-state routing protocols like OSPF and IS-IS in the context of the MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE) and GMPLS. BGP Link-State (BGP-LS) extensions have been defined to distribute these attributes along with other topology information from these link-state routing protocols. New extensions have been defined for link-state routing protocols that enable distribution of application-specific link attributes for existing as well as newer applications such as Segment Routing. This document defines extensions to BGP-LS to enable the advertisement of these application-specific attributes as a part of the topology information from the network.},
}