%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-05 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-04,
    number =    {draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-bgp-only-fabric/04/},
    author =    {Ketan Talaulikar and Aravind Babu MahendraBabu and Clarence Filsfils and Krishnaswamy Ananthamurthy and Shawn Zandi and Gaurav Dawra and Muhammad Durrani},
    title =     {{BGP Link-State Extensions for BGP-only Networks}},
    pagetotal = 26,
    year =      2025,
    month =     oct,
    day =       20,
    abstract =  {BGP is used as the only routing protocol in some networks today. In such networks, it is useful to get a detailed topology view similar to one available when using link state routing protocols. This document defines extensions to the BGP Link-state (BGP-LS) address- family and the procedures for advertisement of topology information in a BGP-only network.},
}