BGP Colored Prefix Routing (CPR) for SRv6 based Services
draft-ietf-idr-cpr-08

Yes

Erik Kline
(John Scudder)

No Objection

Deb Cooley
Jim Guichard
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
(Murray Kucherawy)
(Zaheduzzaman Sarker)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Erik Kline
Yes
Comment (2025-02-08 for -07) Sent 
# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-idr-cpr-07
CC @ekline

* comment syntax:
  - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md

* "Handling Ballot Positions":
  - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/

## Comments

### S4, S6

* Just a reminder that RFC 9602 allocated a prefix for SIDs.  By common
  agreement among participants in the "Consistent Color Domain" filters
  can be adjusted to default drop all 5f00::/16 traffic but permit the
  color prefixes in use by AS1/AS2/AS3.

  No obligation to incorporate this, just food for thought in case you
  think you might be worth a mention.

## Nits

### S2.1

* "distinguish N different intent" -> "distinguish N different intents"
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Comment (2025-02-12 for -07) Sent 
Thanks to Brian Weis for the secdir review.

Section 1, para 3: Nit:  spell out the first time:  LSR? PE?  SAFI?   (I'm sure there are others)

Section 6, para 1, last sentence:  'the impact is acceptable', the impact to what?  Making the routing table too big?  Or something else?  I'd like to see it spelled out what the impact to security is.

Section 6, para 2:  Is the on-path attacker inside the trusted domain?  Or are they on the Internet?  If it is the case that the on-path attacker is inside the trusted domain, then that fact should be highlighted in the security considerations.
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2025-02-19 for -07) Not sent 
Thank you to Vijay K. Gurbani for the GENART review.
John Scudder Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (for -06) Unknown 

                            

                        
                    

                
            
        
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (2025-02-19 for -07)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Sent
                                    
                                
                            

                        

                        
                            

                                
Question #11 of the shepherd writeup doesn't explain, as asked, why Informational is the right status here.

I think you could omit Section 2 (but not its subsections, obviously) and save a bit of space, as it's simply restating part of the table of contents.

                            

                        
                    

                
            
                
                    

                        

                            Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
                        

                        

                            
                            No Objection
                            
                        

                    

                    

                        

                            

                                No Objection 
                                
                                    (for -07)
                                
                                
                                    
                                         Not sent