%% You should probably cite rfc9104 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-idr-eag-distribution-14,
    number =    {draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-14},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution/14/},
    author =    {Zitao Wang and Qin Wu and Jeff Tantsura and Ketan Talaulikar},
    title =     {{Distribution of Traffic Engineering Extended Admin Groups using BGP-LS}},
    pagetotal = 6,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {Administrative groups are link attributes (commonly referred to as "colors" or "link colors") advertised by link state protocols (e.g. ISIS or OSPF) and used for traffic engineering. These administrative groups were initially defined as 32 bit masks. As network usage grew, these 32 bit masks were found to constrain traffic engineering. Therefore, link state protocols (ISIS, OSPF) were expanded to advertise a variable length administrative group.This document defines an extension to BGP-LS for advertisement of extended administrative groups (EAGs) to allow to support a number of administrative groups greater than 32, as defined in {[}RFC7308{]}.},
}