BGP Community Container Attribute
draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities-04
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Robert Raszuk , Jeffrey Haas , Andrew Lange, Bruno Decraene , Shane Amante , Paul Jakma | ||
Last updated | 2017-09-03 (Latest revision 2017-03-02) | ||
Replaces | draft-raszuk-wide-bgp-communities | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews |
OPSDIR Early review
(of
-07)
by Joe Clarke
Has issues
RTGDIR Early review
(of
-07)
by Acee Lindem
Has issues
|
||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Route tagging plays an important role in external BGP [RFC4271] relations, in communicating various routing policies between peers. It is also a very common best practice among operators to propagate various additional information about routes intra-domain. The most common tool used today to attach various information about routes is through the use of BGP communities [RFC1997]. This document defines a new encoding which will enhance and simplify what can be accomplished today with the use of BGP communities. The most important addition this specification makes over currently defined BGP communities is the ability to specify, carry as well as use for execution an operator's defined set of parameters. It also provides an extensible platform for any new community encoding needs in the future.
Authors
Robert Raszuk
Jeffrey Haas
Andrew Lange
Bruno Decraene
Shane Amante
Paul Jakma
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)