Recommended Packet Marking Policy
draft-ietf-ieprep-packet-marking-policy-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(ieprep WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Fred Baker | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2002-07-24) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired (IESG: Dead) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Jon Peterson | ||
| IESG note | |||
| Send notices to | <kimberly.s.king@saic.com> |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This paper summarizes a recommended correlation of applications to Differentiated Service Code Points. There is no intrinsic requirement that individual DSCPs correspond to given applications, but as a policy it is useful if they can be applied consistently.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)