IMAP4 Non-synchronizing Literals
draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2016-05-16
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2016-05-13
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2016-05-13
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT |
2016-04-28
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2016-04-28
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors |
2016-04-27
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2016-04-25
|
04 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2016-04-25
|
04 | (System) | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2016-04-25
|
04 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2016-04-25
|
04 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2016-04-25
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent |
2016-04-25
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2016-04-25
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2016-04-25
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot approval text was generated |
2016-04-25
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Ballot writeup was changed |
2016-04-21
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
2016-04-20
|
04 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2016-04-20
|
04 | Suresh Krishnan | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Suresh Krishnan |
2016-04-20
|
04 | Deborah Brungard | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard |
2016-04-20
|
04 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2016-04-20
|
04 | Mirja Kühlewind | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mirja Kühlewind |
2016-04-20
|
04 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2016-04-19
|
04 | Terry Manderson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Terry Manderson |
2016-04-19
|
04 | Alvaro Retana | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana |
2016-04-19
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2016-04-18
|
04 | Ben Campbell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ben Campbell |
2016-04-18
|
04 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2016-04-17
|
04 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2016-04-07
|
04 | Alexey Melnikov | Notification list changed to "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> from "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> |
2016-04-07
|
04 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot comment] I am the editor |
2016-04-07
|
04 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
2016-04-07
|
04 | Alexey Melnikov | Shepherding AD changed to Ben Campbell |
2016-04-06
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Shepherding AD changed to Alexey Melnikov |
2016-03-23
|
04 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Mahesh Jethanandani. |
2016-03-21
|
04 | Barry Leiba | Ballot has been issued |
2016-03-21
|
04 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2016-03-21
|
04 | Barry Leiba | Created "Approve" ballot |
2016-03-21
|
04 | Barry Leiba | Shepherding AD changed to Ben Campbell |
2016-03-21
|
04 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead |
2016-03-21
|
04 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call |
2016-03-17
|
04 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Klaas Wierenga. |
2016-03-15
|
04 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Mahesh Jethanandani |
2016-03-15
|
04 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Mahesh Jethanandani |
2016-03-13
|
04 | Barry Leiba | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2016-04-21 |
2016-03-10
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern |
2016-03-10
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern |
2016-03-10
|
04 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Klaas Wierenga |
2016-03-10
|
04 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Klaas Wierenga |
2016-03-09
|
04 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2016-03-09
|
04 | Sabrina Tanamal | (Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has completed its review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04.txt. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. IANA … (Via drafts-lastcall-comment@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has completed its review of draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04.txt. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us know. IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are two actions which IANA must complete. First, in the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) Capabilities Registry located at: https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-capabilities/ the existing entry for LITERAL+ Capability Name: LITERAL+ Reference: [ RFC2088 ] will have its reference changed to [ RFC-to-be ]. Second, also in the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) Capabilities Registry located at: https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-capabilities/ a new registration will be made as follows: Capability Name: LITERAL- Reference: [ RFC-to-be ] IANA understands that these are the only actions required to be completed upon approval of this document. Note: The actions requested in this document will not be completed until the document has been approved for publication as an RFC. This message is only to confirm what actions will be performed. Thank you, Sabrina Tanamal IANA Specialist ICANN |
2016-03-07
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2016-03-07
|
04 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" CC: imapapnd-chairs@ietf.org, barryleiba@gmail.com, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis@ietf.org, imapext@ietf.org, "S … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" CC: imapapnd-chairs@ietf.org, barryleiba@gmail.com, sm+ietf@elandsys.com, draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis@ietf.org, imapext@ietf.org, "S Moonesamy" Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals) to Proposed Standard The IESG has received a request from the IMAP APPEND Extensions WG (imapapnd) to consider the following document: - 'IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2016-03-21. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The Internet Message Access Protocol (RFC 3501) contains the "literal" syntactic construct for communicating strings. When sending a literal from client to server, IMAP requires the client to wait for the server to send a command continuation request between sending the octet count and the string data. This document specifies an alternate form of literal that does not require this network round trip. This document specifies 2 IMAP extensions: LITERAL+ and LITERAL-. LITERAL+ allows the alternate form of literals in all IMAP commands. LITERAL- is the same as LITERAL+, but disallows the alternate form of literals unless they are 4096 bytes or less. This document obsoletes RFC 2088. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis/ When IESG discussion begins, it can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2016-03-07
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2016-03-07
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Last call announcement was changed |
2016-03-06
|
04 | Barry Leiba | Last call was requested |
2016-03-06
|
04 | Barry Leiba | Ballot approval text was generated |
2016-03-06
|
04 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2016-03-06
|
04 | Barry Leiba | Last call announcement was changed |
2016-03-06
|
04 | Barry Leiba | Last call announcement was generated |
2016-03-06
|
04 | Alexey Melnikov | New version available: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04.txt |
2016-03-05
|
03 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was changed |
2016-03-05
|
03 | Barry Leiba | Ballot writeup was generated |
2016-03-05
|
03 | Barry Leiba | IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | 1. Summary S. Moonesamy is the Document Shepherd for this document. Barry Leiba is the Responsible Area Director. The document specifies two IMAP extensions: LITERAL+ … 1. Summary S. Moonesamy is the Document Shepherd for this document. Barry Leiba is the Responsible Area Director. The document specifies two IMAP extensions: LITERAL+ and LITERAL-. LITERAL+ allows the alternate form of literals in all IMAP commands. LITERAL- is the same as LITERAL+, but disallows the alternate form of literals unless they are 4096 bytes or less. The type of RFC being requested is Proposed Standard as the draft defines a protocol that will have to be supported on by an IMAP client and an IMAP server. 2. Review and Consensus The document was reviewed by the Imapapnd Working Group. There was a small number of participants interested in the draft. There was WG Consensus on the IMAP4 non-synchronizing literals document. 3. Intellectual Property The author stated that the draft is in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79. The document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | Responsible AD changed to Barry Leiba |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | Changed document writeup |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | Notification list changed to "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> |
2016-03-05
|
03 | S Moonesamy | Document shepherd changed to S Moonesamy |
2016-03-02
|
03 | Alexey Melnikov | New version available: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-03.txt |
2016-02-05
|
02 | Alexey Melnikov | New version available: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-02.txt |
2015-10-18
|
01 | Alexey Melnikov | New version available: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-01.txt |
2015-07-26
|
00 | S Moonesamy | This document now replaces draft-melnikov-rfc2088bis instead of None |
2015-07-26
|
00 | Alexey Melnikov | New version available: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-00.txt |