%% You should probably cite rfc6967 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-09,
    number =    {draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-09},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis/09/},
    author =    {Mohamed Boucadair and Dr. Joseph D. Touch and Pierre Levis and Reinaldo Penno},
    title =     {{Analysis of Solution Candidates to Reveal a Host Identifier (HOST\_ID) in Shared Address Deployments}},
    pagetotal = 23,
    year =      2013,
    month =     apr,
    day =       16,
    abstract =  {This document is a collection of solutions to reveal a host identifier (denoted as HOST\_ID) when a Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) or application proxies are involved in the path. This host identifier could be used by a remote server to sort out the packets by sending host. The host identifier must be unique to each host under the same shared IP address. This document analyzes a set of solution candidates to reveal a host identifier; no recommendation is sketched in the document.},
}