%% You should probably cite rfc6967 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-10, number = {draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis-10}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis/10/}, author = {Mohamed Boucadair and Dr. Joseph D. Touch and Pierre Levis and Reinaldo Penno}, title = {{Analysis of Potential Solutions for Revealing a Host Identifier (HOST\_ID) in Shared Address Deployments}}, pagetotal = 24, year = 2013, month = apr, day = 24, abstract = {This document is a collection of potential solutions for revealing a host identifier (denoted as HOST\_ID) when a Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) or application proxies are involved in the path. This host identifier could be used by a remote server to sort packets according to the sending host. The host identifier must be unique to each host under the same shared IP address. This document analyzes a set of potential solutions for revealing a host identifier and does not recommend a particular solution, although it does highlight the hazards of some approaches.}, }