IP Tunnels in the Internet Architecture
draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-10
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (intarea WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Joseph Touch , Mark Townsley | ||
| Last updated | 2020-03-15 (latest revision 2019-09-12) | ||
| Replaces | draft-touch-intarea-tunnels | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-10.txt
Abstract
This document discusses the role of IP tunnels in the Internet architecture. An IP tunnel transits IP datagrams as payloads in non- link layer protocols. This document explains the relationship of IP tunnels to existing protocol layers and the challenges in supporting IP tunneling, based on the equivalence of tunnels to links. The implications of this document are used to derive recommendations that update MTU and fragment issues in RFC 4459.
Authors
Joseph Touch
(touch@strayalpha.com)
Mark Townsley
(townsley@cisco.com)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)