Definitions of Managed Objects for IP Flow Information Export
draft-ietf-ipfix-rfc5815bis-03
Yes
(Dan Romascanu)
No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -01)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-15 for -02)
Unknown
This looks like a pretty solid MIB module and I have no objection to its publication. I do, however, see a few small points you might want to look at. --- I think the copyright statement in the main Descirption clause should be updated to the current year. --- Revision history Description clause. The plural of erratum is errata. --- I may be mistaken, but I thought there was a recommendation on the maximum length of object names that capped them at 32 characters. There are several really long names in this module: the lnngest I found was the 50 character ipfixTransportSessionOptionsTemplateRefreshTimeout --- I would need to check, but I am pretty sure there is an IANA TC for protocol numbers as used in ipfixTransportSessionProtocol, but if not I think the pointer to http://www.iana.org/ could be improved. --- Unless you intend to support all address types defined by the TC InetAddressType, I think the conformance clauses of all objects with this Syntax need to limit the support, and the description clauses for the objects should state what is and is not supported.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-11 for -01)
Unknown
This document appears to Obsolete RFC 5815, but that is not indicated anywhere in the document, nor in the header. This appears to be simply errata fixes from 5815. Is there a reason it is recycling at Proposed rather than advancing to Internet Standard?
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2012-03-12 for -02)
Unknown
s1: Not sure you need the MUST/MAY in the following because they're not telling me much: Most of the objects defined by the IPFIX MIB module MUST be implemented. Some objects MAY be implemented corresponding to the functionality implemented in the equipment.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -01)
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -02)
Unknown