An analysis of IPv6 anycast
draft-ietf-ipngwg-ipv6-anycast-analysis-02
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(ipv6 WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Ettikan Kandasamy Karupiah , Jun-ichiro Itoh | ||
Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2003-06-30) | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | Informational | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired (IESG: Dead) | |
Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | Margaret Cullen | ||
IESG note | |||
Send notices to | margaret@thingmagic.com |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The memo tries to identify the problems and issues in the use of IPv6 anycast [Hinden, 1998] defined as of today. The goals of the draft are (1) to understand the currently-defined IPv6 anycast better, (2) to provide guidelines for people trying to deploy anycast services, and (3) to suggest updates to IPv6 anycast protocol specification. The document was made possible by input from ipngwg DNS discovery design team.
Authors
Ettikan Kandasamy Karupiah
Jun-ichiro Itoh
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)