IP over InfiniBand (IPoIB) Architecture
draft-ietf-ipoib-architecture-04

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) Yes

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

Margaret and Vivek have shown a draft of the 04 revision which makes clear
that the IPv6 address use is a format.  It no longer mentions "valid IPv6 addresses".
It doesn't quite describe the allocation process to the extent of stating that GIDs
are not allocated by RIRs from the global IPv6 space, but there is no reason to
imagine that they are from this document.  I've removed my Discuss based on
the pre-submission 04.

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) No Objection

Section 2.0 talks about "MIBs".
The proper terminology is: "MIB Modules".

There is one MIB which is composed of multiple MIB Modules.

(David Kessens; former steering group member) No Objection

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection

Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART
Minor issues found, not blocking, copied to document log. Typos are in filed review.

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

  Remove the document references from the Abstract.

  Should there be a question mark in the title of section 3.3?

(Scott Hollenbeck; former steering group member) No Objection

References need normative/informative split.

(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) No Objection

It's nice to see a link layer that's designed for IPv6!

The paragraph mentioning site-local addresses should probably be modified to note that they've been deprecated for IPv6.

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection

(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection

abstract doesn't satisfy ID nits

references not split