%% You should probably cite rfc8468 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-06,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-06},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6/06/},
    author =    {Al Morton and Joachim Fabini and Nalini Elkins and michael ackermann and Vinayak Hegde},
    title =     {{IPv4, IPv6, and IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence: Updates for the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Framework}},
    pagetotal = 15,
    year =      2018,
    month =     jun,
    day =       30,
    abstract =  {This memo updates the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) framework defined by RFC 2330 with new considerations for measurement methodology and testing. It updates the definition of standard-formed packets to include IPv6 packets, deprecates the definition of minimal IP packet, and augments distinguishing aspects, referred to as Type-P, for test packets in RFC 2330. This memo identifies that IPv4-IPv6 coexistence can challenge measurements within the scope of the IPPM framework. Example use cases include, but are not limited to, IPv4-IPv6 translation, NAT, and protocol encapsulation. IPv6 header compression and use of IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Area Networks (6LoWPAN) are considered and excluded from the standard-formed packet evaluation.},
}