%% You should probably cite rfc8250 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option-12,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option-12},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option/12/},
    author =    {Nalini Elkins and Rob Hamilton and michael ackermann},
    title =     {{IPv6 Performance and Diagnostic Metrics (PDM) Destination Option}},
    pagetotal = 30,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {To assess performance problems, this document describes optional headers embedded in each packet that provide sequence numbers and timing information as a basis for measurements. Such measurements may be interpreted in real-time or after the fact. An implementation of the existing IPv6 Destination Options extension header, the Performance and Diagnostic Metrics (PDM) Destination Options extension header as well as the field limits, calculations, and usage of the PDM in measurement are included in this document.},
}