%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-07 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-05,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts-05},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-asymmetrical-pkts/05/},
    author =    {Greg Mirsky and Ernesto Ruffini and Henrik Nydell and Richard "Footer" Foote and Will Hawkins},
    title =     {{Performance Measurement with Asymmetrical Traffic Using STAMP}},
    pagetotal = 13,
    year =      2025,
    month =     mar,
    day =       31,
    abstract =  {This document describes an optional extension to a Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP) that enables control of the length and/or number of reflected packets during a single STAMP test session. In some use cases, the use of asymmetrical test packets allow for the creation of more realistic flows of test packets and, thus, a closer approximation between active performance measurements and conditions experienced by the monitored application. Also, the document includes an analysis of challenges related to performance monitoring in a multicast network. It defines procedures and STAMP extensions to achieve more efficient measurements with a lesser impact on a network.},
}