%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol-07 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-capacity-protocol/02/},
    author =    {Len Ciavattone and Al Morton},
    title =     {{Test Protocol for One-way IP Capacity Measurement}},
    pagetotal = 32,
    year =      2022,
    month =     jul,
    day =       9,
    abstract =  {This memo addresses the problem of protocol support for measuring Network Capacity metrics in RFC 9097, where the method deploys a feedback channel from the receiver to control the sender's transmission rate in near-real-time. This memo defines a simple protocol to perform the RFC 9097 (and other) measurements. See Section 10: The authors seek feedback to determine what additional features will be necessary for an IETF Standards Track Protocol, beyond what is present in the running code available now.},
}