%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ippm-encrypted-pdmv2-06 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-encrypted-pdmv2-01,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-encrypted-pdmv2-01},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-encrypted-pdmv2/01/},
    author =    {Nalini Elkins and michael ackermann and Ameya Deshpande and Tommaso Pecorella and Adnan Rashid},
    title =     {{IPv6 Performance and Diagnostic Metrics Version 2 (PDMv2) Destination Option}},
    pagetotal = 20,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {RFC8250 describes an optional Destination Option (DO) header embedded in each packet to provide sequence numbers and timing information as a basis for measurements. As this data is sent in clear- text, this may create an opportunity for malicious actors to get information for subsequent attacks. This document defines PDMv2 which has a lightweight handshake (registration procedure) and encryption to secure this data. Additional performance metrics which may be of use are also defined.},
}