%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-20 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-17,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity-17},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity/17/},
    author =    {Frank Brockners and Shwetha Bhandari and Tal Mizrahi and Justin Iurman},
    title =     {{Integrity Protection of In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Data Fields}},
    pagetotal = 28,
    year =      2026,
    month =     mar,
    day =       16,
    abstract =  {In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) records operational (including telemetry) information in packets while they traverse a path in the network. RFC 9197 specifies data fields for IOAM (a.k.a IOAM-Data-Fields) and associated data types. This document specifies integrity protection of IOAM-Data-Fields for Intra-IOAM-Domain use cases.},
}