In-situ OAM Deployment
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-03
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 9378.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Frank Brockners , Shwetha Bhandari , Daniel Bernier , Tal Mizrahi | ||
| Last updated | 2023-01-03 (Latest revision 2022-10-12) | ||
| Replaces | draft-brockners-opsawg-ioam-deployment | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
GENART Last Call review
(of
-02)
by Ines Robles
Ready w/nits
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
| Document shepherd | Tommy Pauly | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2022-10-13 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 9378 (Informational) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date |
(None)
Has enough positions to pass. |
||
| Responsible AD | Martin Duke | ||
| Send notices to | tpauly@apple.com | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | Version Changed - Review Needed |
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-03
ippm F. Brockners, Ed.
Internet-Draft Cisco
Intended status: Informational S. Bhandari, Ed.
Expires: July 7, 2023 Thoughtspot
D. Bernier
Bell Canada
T. Mizrahi, Ed.
Huawei
January 3, 2023
In-situ OAM Deployment
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-deployment-03
Abstract
In-situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) collects
operational and telemetry information in the packet while the packet
traverses a path between two points in the network. This document
provides a framework for IOAM deployment and provides IOAM deployment
considerations and guidance.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 7, 2023.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. IOAM Deployment: Domains And Nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Types of IOAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. Per-hop Tracing IOAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.2. Proof of Transit IOAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.3. Edge to Edge IOAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.4. Direct Export IOAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. IOAM Encapsulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.1. IPv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.2. NSH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.3. BIER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5.4. GRE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.5. Geneve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.6. Segment Routing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.7. Segment Routing for IPv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5.8. VXLAN-GPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. IOAM Data Export . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7. IOAM Deployment Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7.1. IOAM Namespaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7.2. IOAM Layering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7.3. IOAM Trace Option Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7.4. Traffic-sets that IOAM Is Applied To . . . . . . . . . . 15
7.5. IOAM Loopback Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
7.6. IOAM Active Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
7.7. Brown Field Deployments: IOAM Unaware Nodes . . . . . . . 16
8. IOAM Manageability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
11. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
12. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
1. Introduction
"In-situ" Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) collects
OAM information within the packet while the packet traverses a
particular network domain. The term "in-situ" refers to the fact
that the OAM data is added to the data packets rather than is being
sent within packets specifically dedicated to OAM. IOAM is to
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
complement mechanisms such as Ping, Traceroute, or other active
probing mechanisms. In terms of "active" or "passive" OAM, "in-situ"
OAM can be considered a hybrid OAM type. "In-situ" mechanisms do not
require extra packets to be sent. IOAM adds information to the
already available data packets and therefore cannot be considered
passive. In terms of the classification given in [RFC7799] IOAM
could be portrayed as Hybrid Type I. IOAM mechanisms can be
leveraged where mechanisms using e.g., ICMP do not apply or do not
offer the desired results, such as proving that a certain traffic
flow takes a pre-defined path, SLA verification for the live data
traffic, detailed statistics on traffic distribution paths in
networks that distribute traffic across multiple paths, or scenarios
in which probe traffic is potentially handled differently from
regular data traffic by the network devices.
2. Conventions
Abbreviations used in this document:
BIER: Bit Index Explicit Replication [RFC8279]
Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation [RFC8926]
GRE: Generic Routing Encapsulation [RFC2784]
IOAM: In-situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
MTU: Maximum Transmit Unit
NSH: Network Service Header [RFC8300]
OAM: Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
POT: Proof of Transit
VXLAN-GPE: Virtual eXtensible Local Area Network, Generic Protocol
Extension [I-D.ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe]
3. IOAM Deployment: Domains And Nodes
IOAM is focused on "limited domains" as defined in [RFC8799]. IOAM
is not targeted for a deployment on the global Internet. The part of
the network which employs IOAM is referred to as the "IOAM-Domain".
For example, an IOAM-domain can include an enterprise campus using
physical connections between devices or an overlay network using
virtual connections / tunnels for connectivity between said devices.
An IOAM-domain is defined by its perimeter or edge. The operator of
an IOAM-domain is expected to put provisions in place to ensure that
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
packets which contain IOAM data fields do not leak beyond the edge of
an IOAM domain, e.g., using for example packet filtering methods.
The operator should consider the potential operational impact of IOAM
to mechanisms such as ECMP load-balancing schemes (e.g., load-
balancing schemes based on packet length could be impacted by the
increased packet size due to IOAM), path MTU (i.e., ensure that the
MTU of all links within a domain is sufficiently large to support the
increased packet size due to IOAM) and ICMP message handling.
An IOAM-Domain consists of "IOAM encapsulating nodes", "IOAM
decapsulating nodes" and "IOAM transit nodes". The role of a node
(i.e., encapsulating, transit, decapsulating) is defined within an
IOAM-Namespace (see below). A node can have different roles in
different IOAM-Namespaces.
An "IOAM encapsulating node" incorporates one or more IOAM-Option-
Types into packets that IOAM is enabled for. If IOAM is enabled for
a selected subset of the traffic, the IOAM encapsulating node is
responsible for applying the IOAM functionality to the selected
subset.
An "IOAM transit node" updates one or more of the IOAM-Data-Fields.
If both the Pre-allocated and the Incremental Trace Option-Types are
present in the packet, each IOAM transit node will update at most one
of these Option-Types. Note that in case both Trace Option-Types are
present in a packet, it is up to the IOAM data processing systems
(see Section 6) to integrate the data from the two Trace Option-Types
to form a view of the entire journey of the packet. A transit node
does not add new IOAM-Option-Types to a packet, and does not change
the IOAM-Data-Fields of an IOAM Edge-to-Edge Option-Type.
An "IOAM decapsulating node" removes IOAM-Option-Type(s) from
packets.
The role of an IOAM-encapsulating, IOAM-transit or IOAM-decapsulating
node is always performed within a specific IOAM-Namespace. This
means that an IOAM node which is e.g., an IOAM-decapsulating node for
IOAM-Namespace "A" but not for IOAM-Namespace "B" will only remove
the IOAM-Option-Types for IOAM-Namespace "A" from the packet. An
IOAM decapsulating node situated at the edge of an IOAM domain
removes all IOAM-Option-Types and associated encapsulation headers
for all IOAM-Namespaces from the packet.
IOAM-Namespaces allow for a namespace-specific definition and
interpretation of IOAM-Data-Fields. An interface-id could for
example point to a physical interface (e.g., to understand which
physical interface of an aggregated link is used when receiving or
transmitting a packet) whereas in another case it could refer to a
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
logical interface (e.g., in case of tunnels). Please refer to
Section 7.1 for a discussion of IOAM-Namespaces.
Export of Export of Export of Export of
IOAM data IOAM data IOAM data IOAM data
(optional) (optional) (optional) (optional)
^ ^ ^ ^
| | | |
| | | |
User +---+----+ +---+----+ +---+----+ +---+----+
packets |Encapsu-| | Transit| | Transit| |Decapsu-|
-------->|lating |====>| Node |====>| Node |====>|lating |-->
|Node | | A | | B | |Node |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
Figure 1: Roles of IOAM nodes
IOAM nodes which add or remove the IOAM-Data-Fields can also update
the IOAM-Data-Fields at the same time. Or in other words, IOAM
encapsulating or decapsulating nodes can also serve as IOAM transit
nodes at the same time. Note that not every node in an IOAM domain
needs to be an IOAM transit node. For example, a deployment might
require that packets traverse a set of firewalls which support IOAM.
In that case, only the set of firewall nodes would be IOAM transit
nodes rather than all nodes.
4. Types of IOAM
IOAM supports different modes of operation, which are differentiated
by the type of IOAM data fields being carried in the packet, the data
being collected, the type of nodes which collect or update data as
well as whether and how nodes export IOAM information.
o Per-hop tracing: OAM information about each IOAM node a packet
traverses is collected and stored within the user data packet as
the packet progresses through the IOAM domain. Potential uses of
IOAM per-hop tracing include:
* Understand the different paths different packets traverse
between an IOAM encapsulating and an IOAM decapsulating node in
a network that uses load balancing such as Equal Cost Multi-
Path (ECMP). This information could be used to tune the
algorithm for ECMP for optimized network resource usage.
* Operations/Troubleshooting: Understand which path a particular
packet or set of packets take as well as what amount of jitter
and delay different IOAM nodes in the path contribute to the
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
overall delay and jitter between the IOAM encapsulating node
and the IOAM decapsulating node.
o Proof-of-transit: Information that a verifier node can use to
verify whether a packet has traversed all nodes that is supposed
to traverse is stored within the user data packet. Proof-of-
transit could for example be used to verify that a packet indeed
passes through all services of a service function chain (e.g.,
verify whether a packet indeed traversed the set of firewalls that
it is expected to traverse), or whether a packet indeed took the
expected path.
o Edge-to-edge: OAM information which is specific to the edges of an
IOAM domain is collected and stored within the user data packet.
Edge-to-Edge OAM could be used to gather operational information
about a particular network domain, such as the delay and jitter
incurred by that network domain or the traffic matrix of the
network domain.
o Direct export: OAM information about each IOAM node a packet
traverses is collected and immediately exported to a collector.
Direct export could be used in situations where per-hop tracing
information is desired, but gathering the information within the
packet - as with per-hop tracing - is not feasible. Rather than
automatically correlating the per-hop tracing information, as done
with per-hop tracing, direct export requires a collector to
correlate the information from the individual nodes. In addition,
all nodes enabled for direct export need to be capable to export
the IOAM information to the collector.
4.1. Per-hop Tracing IOAM
"IOAM tracing data" is expected to be collected at every IOAM transit
node that a packet traverses to ensure visibility into the entire
path a packet takes within an IOAM-Domain. I.e., in a typical
deployment all nodes in an IOAM-Domain would participate in IOAM and
thus be IOAM transit nodes, IOAM encapsulating or IOAM decapsulating
nodes. If not all nodes within a domain are IOAM capable, IOAM
tracing information (i.e., node data, see below) will only be
collected on those nodes which are IOAM capable. Nodes which are not
IOAM capable will forward the packet without any changes to the IOAM-
Data-Fields. The maximum number of hops and the minimum path MTU of
the IOAM domain is assumed to be known.
IOAM offers two different trace Option-Types, the "incremental"
Option-Type as well as the "pre-allocated" Option-Type. For a
discussion which of the two option types is the most suitable for an
implementation and/or deployment, see Section 7.3.
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
Every node data entry holds information for a particular IOAM transit
node that is traversed by a packet. The IOAM decapsulating node
removes the IOAM-Option-Type(s) and processes and/or exports the
associated data. All IOAM-Data-Fields are defined in the context of
an IOAM-Namespace.
IOAM tracing can collect the following types of information:
o Identification of the IOAM node. An IOAM node identifier can
match to a device identifier or a particular control point or
subsystem within a device.
o Identification of the interface that a packet was received on,
i.e. ingress interface.
o Identification of the interface that a packet was sent out on,
i.e. egress interface.
o Time of day when the packet was processed by the node as well as
the transit delay. Different definitions of processing time are
feasible and expected, though it is important that all devices of
an in-situ OAM domain follow the same definition.
o Generic data: Format-free information where syntax and semantic of
the information is defined by the operator in a specific
deployment. For a specific IOAM-Namespace, all IOAM nodes should
interpret the generic data the same way. Examples for generic
IOAM data include geolocation information (location of the node at
the time the packet was processed), buffer queue fill level or
cache fill level at the time the packet was processed, or even a
battery charge level.
o Information to detect whether IOAM trace data was added at every
hop or whether certain hops in the domain weren't IOAM transit
nodes.
o Data that relates to how the packet traversed a node (transit
delay, buffer occupancy in case the packet was buffered, queue
depth in case the packet was queued)
The Option-Types of incremental tracing and pre-allocated tracing are
defined in [RFC9197].
4.2. Proof of Transit IOAM
IOAM Proof of Transit Option-Type is to support path or service
function chain [RFC7665] verification use cases. Proof-of-transit
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
could use methods like nested hashing or nested encryption of the
IOAM data.
The IOAM Proof of Transit Option-Type consist of a fixed size "IOAM
proof of transit option header" and "IOAM proof of transit option
data fields". For details see [RFC9197].
4.3. Edge to Edge IOAM
The IOAM Edge-to-Edge Option-Type is to carry data that is added by
the IOAM encapsulating node and interpreted by IOAM decapsulating
node. The IOAM transit nodes may process the data but must not
modify it.
The IOAM Edge-to-Edge Option-Type consist of a fixed size "IOAM Edge-
to-Edge Option-Type header" and "IOAM Edge-to-Edge Option-Type data
fields". For details see [RFC9197].
4.4. Direct Export IOAM
Direct Export is an IOAM mode of operation within which IOAM data to
be directly exported to a collector rather than being collected
within the data packets. The IOAM Direct Export Option-Type consist
of a fixed size "IOAM direct export option header". Direct Export
for IOAM is defined in [RFC9326].
5. IOAM Encapsulations
IOAM data fields and associated data types for in-situ OAM are
defined in [RFC9197]. The in-situ OAM data field can be transported
by a variety of transport protocols, including NSH, Segment Routing,
Geneve, BIER, IPv6, etc.
5.1. IPv6
IOAM encapsulation for IPv6 is defined in
[I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options], which also discussed IOAM
deployment considerations for IPv6 networks
5.2. NSH
IOAM encapsulation for NSH is defined in [I-D.ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh].
5.3. BIER
IOAM encapsulation for BIER is defined in [I-D.xzlnp-bier-ioam].
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
5.4. GRE
IOAM encapsulation for GRE is outlined as part of the "EtherType
Protocol Identification of In-situ OAM Data" in
[I-D.weis-ippm-ioam-eth].
5.5. Geneve
IOAM encapsulation for Geneve is defined in
[I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-geneve].
5.6. Segment Routing
IOAM encapsulation for Segment Routing is defined in
[I-D.gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls].
5.7. Segment Routing for IPv6
IOAM encapsulation for Segment Routing over IPv6 is defined in
[I-D.ali-spring-ioam-srv6].
5.8. VXLAN-GPE
IOAM encapsulation for VXLAN-GPE is defined in
[I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe].
6. IOAM Data Export
IOAM nodes collect information for packets traversing a domain that
supports IOAM. IOAM decapsulating nodes as well as IOAM transit
nodes can choose to retrieve IOAM information from the packet,
process the information further and export the information using
e.g., IPFIX.
Raw data export of IOAM data using IPFIX is discussed in
[I-D.spiegel-ippm-ioam-rawexport]. "Raw export of IOAM data" refers
to a mode of operation where a node exports the IOAM data as it is
received in the packet. The exporting node neither interprets,
aggregates nor reformats the IOAM data before it is exported. Raw
export of IOAM data is to support an operational model where the
processing and interpretation of IOAM data is decoupled from the
operation of encapsulating/updating/decapsulating IOAM data, which is
also referred to as IOAM data-plane operation. The figure below
shows the separation of concerns for IOAM export: Exporting IOAM data
is performed by the "IOAM node" which performs IOAM data-plane
operation, whereas the interpretation of IOAM data is performed by
one or several IOAM data processing systems. The separation of
concerns is to off-load interpretation, aggregation and formatting of
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
IOAM data from the node which performs data-plane operations. In
other words, a node which is focused on data-plane operations, i.e.
forwarding of packets and handling IOAM data will not be tasked to
also interpret the IOAM data, but can leave this task to another
system or a set of systems. For scalability reasons, a single IOAM
node could choose to export IOAM data to several IOAM data processing
systems. Similarly, there several monitoring systems or analytics
systems can be used to further process the data received from the
IOAM preprocessing systems. Figure 2 shows an overview of IOAM
export, including IOAM data processing systems and monitoring/
analytics systems.
+--------------+
+-------------+ |
| Monitoring/ | |
| Analytics | |
| system(s) |-+
+-------------+
^
| Processed/interpreted/
| aggregated IOAM data
|
+--------------+
+-------------+ |
| IOAM data | |
| processing | |
| system(s) |-+
+-------------+
^
| Raw export of
| IOAM data
|
+--------------+-------+------+--------------+
| | | |
| | | |
User +---+----+ +---+----+ +---+----+ +---+----+
packets |Encapsu-| | Transit| | Transit| |Decapsu-|
-------->|lating |====>| Node |====>| Node |====>|lating |-->
|Node | | A | | B | |Node |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
Figure 2: IOAM framework with data export
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
7. IOAM Deployment Considerations
This section describes several concepts of IOAM, and provides
considerations that need to be taken to account when implementing
IOAM in a network domain. This includes concepts like IOAM
Namespaces, IOAM Layering, traffic-sets that IOAM is applied to and
IOAM loopback mode. For a definition of IOAM Namespaces and IOAM
layering, please refer to [RFC9197]. IOAM loopback mode is defined
in [RFC9322]
7.1. IOAM Namespaces
IOAM-Namespaces add further context to IOAM-Option-Types and
associated IOAM-Data-Fields. IOAM-Namespaces support several uses:
o IOAM-Namespaces can be used by an operator to distinguish
different operational domains. Devices at domain edges can filter
on Namespace-IDs to provide for proper IOAM-Domain isolation.
o IOAM-Namespaces provide additional context for IOAM-Data-Fields
and thus ensure that IOAM-Data-Fields are unique and can be
interpreted properly by management stations or network
controllers. While, for example, the node identifier field does
not need to be unique in a deployment (e.g., an operator may wish
to use different node identifiers for different IOAM layers, even
within the same device; or node identifiers might not be unique
for other organizational reasons, such as after a merger of two
formerly separated organizations), the combination of node_id and
Namespace-ID should always be unique. Similarly, IOAM-Namespaces
can be used to define how certain IOAM-Data-Fields are
interpreted: IOAM offers three different timestamp format options.
The Namespace-ID can be used to determine the timestamp format.
IOAM-Data-Fields (e.g., buffer occupancy) which do not have a unit
associated are to be interpreted within the context of a IOAM-
Namespace.
o IOAM-Namespaces can be used to identify different sets of devices
(e.g., different types of devices) in a deployment: If an operator
desires to insert different IOAM-Data-Fields based on the device,
the devices could be grouped into multiple IOAM-Namespaces. This
could be due to the fact that the IOAM feature set differs between
different sets of devices, or it could be for reasons of optimized
space usage in the packet header. It could also stem from
hardware or operational limitations on the size of the trace data
that can be added and processed, preventing collection of a full
trace for a flow.
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
* Assigning different IOAM Namespace-IDs to different sets of
nodes or network partitions and using the Namespace-ID as a
selector at the IOAM encapsulating node, a full trace for a
flow could be collected and constructed via partial traces in
different packets of the same flow. Example: An operator could
choose to group the devices of a domain into two IOAM-
Namespaces, in a way that at average, only every second hop
would be recorded by any device. To retrieve a full view of
the deployment, the captured IOAM-Data-Fields of the two IOAM-
Namespaces need to be correlated.
* Assigning different IOAM Namespace-IDs to different sets of
nodes or network partitions and using a separate instance of an
IOAM-Option-Type for each Namespace-ID, a full trace for a flow
could be collected and constructed via partial traces from each
IOAM-Option-Type in each of the packets in the flow. Example:
An operator could choose to group the devices of a domain into
two IOAM-Namespaces, in a way that each IOAM-Namespace is
represented by one of two IOAM-Option-Types in the packet.
Each node would record data only for the IOAM-Namespace that it
belongs to, ignoring the other IOAM-Option-Type with a IOAM-
Namespace to which it doesn't belong. To retrieve a full view
of the deployment, the captured IOAM-Data-Fields of the two
IOAM-Namespaces need to be correlated.
7.2. IOAM Layering
If several encapsulation protocols (e.g., in case of tunneling) are
stacked on top of each other, IOAM-Data-Fields could be present in
different protocol fields at different layers. Layering allows
operators to instrument the protocol layer they want to measure. The
behavior follows the ships-in-the-night model, i.e., IOAM-Data-Fields
in one layer are independent of IOAM-Data-Fields in another layer.
Or in other words: Even though the term "layering" often implies some
form of hierarchy and relationship, in IOAM, layers are independent
of each other and don't assume any relationship among them. The
different layers could, but do not have to share the same IOAM
encapsulation mechanisms. Similarly, the semantics of the IOAM-Data-
Fields, can, but do not have to be associated to cross different
layers. For example, a node which inserts node-id information into
two different layers could use "node-id=10" for one layer and "node-
id=1000" for the second layer.
Figure 3 shows an example of IOAM layering. The figure shows a
Geneve tunnel carried over IPv6 which starts at node A and ends at
node D. IOAM information is encapsulated in IPv6 as well as in
Geneve. At the IPv6 layer, node A is the IOAM encapsulating node
(into IPv6), node D is the IOAM decapsulating node and node B and
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
node C are IOAM transit nodes. At the Geneve layer, node A is the
IOAM encapsulating node (into Geneve) and node D is the IOAM
decapsulating node (from Geneve). The use of IOAM at both layers as
shown in the example here could be used to reveal which nodes of an
underlay (here the IPv6 network) are traversed by tunneled packet in
an overlay (here the Geneve network) - which assumes that the IOAM
information encapsulated by nodes A and D into Geneve and IPv6 is
associated to each other.
+---+----+ +---+----+
User |Geneve | |Geneve |
packets |Encapsu-| |Decapsu-|
-------->|lating |==================================>|lating |-->
| Node | | Node |
| A | | D |
+--------+ +--------+
^ ^
| |
v v
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
|IPv6 | | IPv6 | | IPv6 | |IPv6 |
|Encapsu-| | Transit| | Transit| |Decapsu-|
|lating |====>| Node |====>| Node |====>|lating |
| Node | | | | | | Node |
| A | | B | | C | | D |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
Figure 3: IOAM layering example
7.3. IOAM Trace Option Types
IOAM offers two different IOAM Option-Types for tracing:
"Incremental" Trace-Option-Type and "Pre-allocated" Trace-Option-
Type. "Incremental" refers to a mode of operation where the packet
is expanded at every IOAM node that adds IOAM-Data-Fields. "Pre-
Allocated" describes a mode of operation where the IOAM encapsulating
node allocates room for all IOAM-Data-Fields in the entire IOAM
domain. More specifically:
Pre-allocated Trace-Option: This trace option is defined as a
container of node data fields with pre-allocated space for each
node to populate its information. This option is useful for
implementations where it is efficient to allocate the space once
and index into the array to populate the data during transit
(e.g., software forwarders often fall into this class).
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
Incremental Trace-Option: This trace option is defined as a
container of node data fields where each node allocates and pushes
its node data immediately following the option header.
Which IOAM Trace-Option-Types can be supported is not only a function
of operator-defined configuration, but may also be limited by
protocol constraints unique to a given encapsulating protocol. For
encapsulating protocols which support both IOAM Trace-Option-Types,
the operator decides by means of configuration which Trace-Option-
Type(s) will be used for a particular domain. In this case,
deployments can mix devices which include either the Incremental
Trace-Option-Type or the Pre-allocated Trace-Option-Type, If for
example different types of packet forwarders and associated different
types of IOAM implementations exist in a deployment and the
encapsulating protocol supports both IOAM Trace-Option-Types, a
deployment can mix devices which include either the Incremental
Trace-Option-Type or the Pre-allocated Trace-Option-Type. As a
result, both Option-Types can be present in a packet. IOAM
decapsulating nodes remove both types of Trace-Option-Types from the
packet.
The two different Option-Types cater to different packet forwarding
infrastructures and are to allow an optimized implementation of IOAM
tracing:
Pre-allocated Trace-Option: For some implementations of packet
forwarders it is efficient to allocate the space for the maximum
number of nodes that IOAM Trace Data-Fields should be collected
from and insert/update information in the packet at flexible
locations, based on a pointer retrieved from a field in the
packet. The IOAM encapsulating node allocates an array of the
size of the maximum number of nodes that IOAM Trace Data-Fields
should be collected from. IOAM transit nodes index into the array
to populate the data during transit. Software forwarders often
fall into this class of packet forwarder implementations. The
maximum number of nodes that IOAM information could be collected
from is configured by the operator on the IOAM encapsulating node.
The operator has to ensure that the packet with the pre-allocated
array that carries the IOAM Data-Fields does not exceed the MTU of
any of the links in the IOAM domain.
Incremental Trace-Option: Looking up a pointer contained in the
packet and inserting/updating information at a flexible location
in the packet as a result of the pointer lookup is costly for some
forwarding infrastructures. Hardware-based packet forwarding
infrastructures often fall into this category. Consequently,
hardware-based packet forwarders could choose to support the
incremental IOAM-Trace-Option-Type. The incremental IOAM-Trace-
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
Option-Type eliminates the need for the IOAM transit nodes to read
the full array in the Trace-Option-Type and allows packets to grow
to the size of the MTU of the IOAM domain. IOAM transit nodes
will expand the packet and insert the IOAM-Data-Fields as long as
there is space available in the packet, i.e. as long as the size
of the packet stays within the bounds of the MTU of the links in
the IOAM domain. There is no need for the operator to configure
the IOAM encapsulation node with the maximum number of nodes that
IOAM information could be collected from. The operator has to
ensure that the minimum MTU of the links in the IOAM domain is
known to all IOAM transit nodes.
7.4. Traffic-sets that IOAM Is Applied To
IOAM can be deployed on all or only on subsets of the live user
traffic, e.g., per interface, based on an access control list or flow
specification defining a specific set of traffic, etc.
7.5. IOAM Loopback Mode
IOAM Loopback is used to trigger each transit device along the path
of a packet to send a copy of the data packet back to the source.
Loopback allows an IOAM encapsulating node to trace the path to a
given destination, and to receive per-hop data about both the forward
and the return path. Loopback is enabled by the encapsulating node
setting the loopback flag. Looped-back packets use the source
address of the original packet as destination address and the address
of the node which performs the loopback operation as source address.
Nodes which loop back a packet clear the loopback flag before sending
the copy back towards the source. Loopack applies to IOAM
deployments where the encapsulating node is either a host or the
start of a tunnel: For details on IOAM loopback, please refer to
[RFC9322].
7.6. IOAM Active Mode
The IOAM active mode flag indicates that a packet is an active OAM
packet as opposed to regular user data traffic. Active mode is
expected to be used for active measurement using IOAM. For details
on IOAM active mode, please refer to [RFC9322].
Example use-cases for IOAM Active Mode include:
o Endpoint detailed active measurement: Synthetic probe packets are
sent between the source and destination. These probe packets
include a Trace Option-Type (i.e., either incremental or pre-
allocated). Since the probe packets are sent between the
endpoints, these packets are treated as data packets by the IOAM
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
domain, and do not require special treatment at the IOAM layer.
The source, which is also the IOAM encapsulating node can choose
to set the Active flag, providing an explicit indication that
these probe packets are meant for telemetry collection.
o IOAM active measurement using probe packets: Probe packets are
generated and transmitted by an IOAM encapsulating node towards a
destination which is also the IOAM decapsulating node. Probe
packets include a Trace Option-Type (i.e., either incremental or
pre-allocated) which has its Active flag set.
o IOAM active measurement using replicated data packets: Probe
packets are created by an IOAM encapsulating node by selecting
some or all of the en route data packets and replicating them. A
selected data packet that is replicated, and its (possibly
truncated) copy is forwarded with one or more IOAM option, while
the original packet is forwarded normally, without IOAM options.
To the extent possible, the original data packet and its replica
are forwarded through the same path. The replica includes a Trace
Option-Type that has its Active flag set, indicating that the IOAM
decapsulating node should terminate it. In this case the IOAM
Active flag ensures that the replicated traffic is not forwarded
beyond the IOAM domain.
7.7. Brown Field Deployments: IOAM Unaware Nodes
A network can consist of a mix of IOAM aware and IOAM unaware nodes.
The encapsulation of IOAM-Data-Fields into different protocols (see
also Section 5) are defined such that data packets that include IOAM-
Data-Fields do not get dropped by IOAM unaware nodes. For example,
packets which contain the IOAM-Trace-Option-Types in IPv6 Hop by Hop
extension headers are defined with bits to indicate "00 - skip over
this option and continue processing the header". This will ensure
that when a node that is IOAM unaware receives a packet with IOAM-
Data-Fields included, does not drop the packet.
Deployments which leverage the IOAM-Trace-Option-Type(s) could
benefit from the ability to detect the presence of IOAM unaware
nodes, i.e. nodes which forward the packet but do not update/add
IOAM-Data-Fields in IOAM-Trace-Option-Type(s). The node data that is
defined as part of the IOAM-Trace-Option-Type(s) includes a Hop_Lim
field associated to the node identifier to detect missed nodes, i.e.
"holes" in the trace. Monitoring/Analytics system(s) could utilize
this information to account for the presence of IOAM unaware nodes in
the network.
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
8. IOAM Manageability
The YANG model for configuring IOAM in network nodes which support
IOAM is defined in [I-D.zhou-ippm-ioam-yang].
A deployment can leverage IOAM profiles to limit the scope of IOAM
features, allowing simpler implementation, verification, and
interoperability testing in the context of specific use cases that do
not require the full functionality of IOAM. An IOAM profile defines
a use case or a set of use cases for IOAM, and an associated set of
rules that restrict the scope and features of the IOAM specification,
thereby limiting it to a subset of the full functionality. IOAM
profiles are defined in [I-D.mizrahi-ippm-ioam-profile].
For deployments where the IOAM capabilities of a node are unknown,
[I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state] [RFC9322] could be used to discover
the enabled IOAM capabilities of nodes.
9. IANA Considerations
This document does not request any IANA actions.
10. Security Considerations
As discussed in [RFC7276], a successful attack on an OAM protocol in
general, and specifically on IOAM, can prevent the detection of
failures or anomalies, or create a false illusion of nonexistent
ones.
The Proof of Transit Option-Type (Section 4.2) is used for verifying
the path of data packets. The security considerations of POT are
further discussed in [I-D.ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit].
Security considerations related to the use of IOAM flags, in
particular the loopback flag are found in [RFC9322].
IOAM data can be subject to eavesdropping. Although the
confidentiality of the user data is not at risk in this context, the
IOAM data elements can be used for network reconnaissance, allowing
attackers to collect information about network paths, performance,
queue states, buffer occupancy and other information. Recon is an
improbable security threat in an IOAM deployment that is within a
confined physical domain. However, in deployments that are not
confined to a single LAN, but span multiple interconnected sites (for
example, using an overlay network), the inter-site links are expected
to be secured (e.g., by IPsec) in order to avoid external
eavesdropping and introduction of malicious or false data. Another
possible mitigation approach is to use the "direct exporting" mode
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
[RFC9326]. In this case the IOAM related trace information would not
be available in the customer data packets, but would trigger
exporting of (secured) packet-related IOAM information at every node.
IOAM data export and securing IOAM data export is outside the scope
of this document.
IOAM can be used as a means for implementing Denial of Service (DoS)
attacks, or for amplifying them. For example, a malicious attacker
can add an IOAM header to packets or modify an IOAM header in en
route packets in order to consume the resources of network devices
that take part in IOAM or collectors that analyze the IOAM data.
Another example is a packet length attack, in which an attacker
pushes headers associated with IOAM Option-Types into data packets,
causing these packets to be increased beyond the MTU size, resulting
in fragmentation or in packet drops. Such DoS attacks can be
mitigated by deploying IOAM in confined administrative domains, and
by limiting the rate and/or the percentage of packets that an IOAM
encapsulating node adds IOAM information to, as well as limiting rate
and/or percentage of packets that an IOAM transit or an IOAM
decapsulating node creates to export IOAM information extracted from
the data packets that carry IOAM information.
Even though IOAM focused on limited domains [RFC8799], there might be
deployments for which it is important for IOAM transit nodes and IOAM
decapsulating nodes to know that the data received hadn't been
tampered with. In those cases, the IOAM data should be integrity
protected.
In addition, Since IOAM options may include timestamps, if network
devices use synchronization protocols then any attack on the time
protocol [RFC7384] can compromise the integrity of the timestamp-
related data fields. Synchronization attacks can be mitigated by
combining a secured time distribution scheme, e.g., [RFC8915], and by
using redundant clock sources [RFC5905] and/or redundant network
paths for the time distribution protocol [RFC8039]. Integrity
protection of IOAM data fields is described in
[I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity].
At the management plane, attacks may be implemented by misconfiguring
or by maliciously configuring IOAM-enabled nodes in a way that
enables other attacks. Thus, IOAM configuration should be secured in
a way that authenticates authorized users and verifies the integrity
of configuration procedures.
Notably, IOAM is expected to be deployed in limited network domains
([RFC8799]), thus confining the potential attack vectors to within
the limited domain. Indeed, in order to limit the scope of threats
to within the current network domain the network operator is expected
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
to enforce policies that prevent IOAM traffic from leaking outside
the IOAM domain, and prevent an attacker from introducing malicious
or false IOAM data to be processed and used within the IOAM domain.
IOAM data leakage could lead to privacy issues. Consider an IOAM
encapsulating node that is a home gateway in an operator's network.
A home gateway is often identified with an individual, and revealing
IOAM data such as "IOAM node identifier" or geolocation information
outside of the limited domain could be harmful for that user. Note
that the Direct Export mode [RFC9326] can mitigate the potential
threat of IOAM data leaking through data packets.
11. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Tal Mizrahi, Eric Vyncke, Nalini
Elkins, Srihari Raghavan, Ranganathan T S, Barak Gafni, Karthik Babu
Harichandra Babu, Akshaya Nadahalli, LJ Wobker, Erik Nordmark,
Vengada Prasad Govindan, Andrew Yourtchenko, Aviv Kfir, Tianran Zhou,
Zhenbin (Robin), Joe Clarke, Al Morton, Tom Herbet, Haoyu song, and
Mickey Spiegel for the comments and advice on IOAM.
12. Informative References
[I-D.ali-spring-ioam-srv6]
Ali, Z., Gandhi, R., Filsfils, C., Brockners, F., Nainar,
N., Pignataro, C., Li, C., Chen, M., and G. Dawra,
"Segment Routing Header encapsulation for In-situ OAM
Data", draft-ali-spring-ioam-srv6-06 (work in progress),
July 2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ali-
spring-ioam-srv6-06.txt>.
[I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-geneve]
Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Govindan, V., Pignataro, C.,
Nainar, N., Gredler, H., Leddy, J., Youell, S., Mizrahi,
T., Lapukhov, P., Gafni, B., Kfir, A., and M. Spiegel,
"Geneve encapsulation for In-situ OAM Data", draft-
brockners-ippm-ioam-geneve-05 (work in progress), November
2020, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-brockners-
ippm-ioam-geneve-05.txt>.
[I-D.brockners-ippm-ioam-vxlan-gpe]
Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Govindan, V., Pignataro, C.,
Gredler, H., Leddy, J., Youell, S., Mizrahi, T., Kfir, A.,
Gafni, B., Lapukhov, P., and M. Spiegel, "VXLAN-GPE
Encapsulation for In-situ OAM Data", draft-brockners-ippm-
ioam-vxlan-gpe-03 (work in progress), November 2019,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-brockners-ippm-
ioam-vxlan-gpe-03.txt>.
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
[I-D.gandhi-spring-ioam-sr-mpls]
Gandhi, R., Ali, Z., Filsfils, C., Brockners, F., Wen, B.,
and V. Kozak, "Segment Routing with MPLS Data Plane
Encapsulation for In-situ OAM Data", draft-gandhi-spring-
ioam-sr-mpls-02 (work in progress), August 2019,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gandhi-spring-ioam-
sr-mpls-02.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state]
Min, X., Mirsky, G., and L. Bo, "Echo Request/Reply for
Enabled In-situ OAM Capabilities", draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-
conf-state-10 (work in progress), November 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-
conf-state-10.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data-integrity]
Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Mizrahi, T., and J. Iurman,
"Integrity of In-situ OAM Data Fields", draft-ietf-ippm-
ioam-data-integrity-03 (work in progress), November 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-
data-integrity-03.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options]
Bhandari, S. and F. Brockners, "In-situ OAM IPv6 Options",
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-09 (work in progress),
October 2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-
ippm-ioam-ipv6-options-09.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe]
Maino, F., Kreeger, L., and U. Elzur, "Generic Protocol
Extension for VXLAN (VXLAN-GPE)", draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-
gpe-12 (work in progress), September 2021,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-
gpe-12.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh]
Brockners, F. and S. Bhandari, "Network Service Header
(NSH) Encapsulation for In-situ OAM (IOAM) Data", draft-
ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh-11 (work in progress), September 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-ioam-nsh-
11.txt>.
[I-D.ietf-sfc-proof-of-transit]
Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Mizrahi, T., Dara, S., and S.
Youell, "Proof of Transit", draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-
transit-08 (work in progress), November 2020,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sfc-proof-of-
transit-08.txt>.
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
[I-D.mizrahi-ippm-ioam-profile]
Mizrahi, T., Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Sivakolundu, R.,
Pignataro, C., Kfir, A., Gafni, B., Spiegel, M., and T.
Zhou, "In Situ OAM Profiles", draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-
profile-06 (work in progress), February 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-
profile-06.txt>.
[I-D.spiegel-ippm-ioam-rawexport]
Spiegel, M., Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., and R.
Sivakolundu, "In-situ OAM raw data export with IPFIX",
draft-spiegel-ippm-ioam-rawexport-06 (work in progress),
February 2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-
spiegel-ippm-ioam-rawexport-06.txt>.
[I-D.weis-ippm-ioam-eth]
Weis, B., Brockners, F., Hill, C., Bhandari, S., Govindan,
V., Pignataro, C., Nainar, N., Gredler, H., Leddy, J.,
Youell, S., Mizrahi, T., Kfir, A., Gafni, B., Lapukhov,
P., and M. Spiegel, "EtherType Protocol Identification of
In-situ OAM Data", draft-weis-ippm-ioam-eth-05 (work in
progress), February 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-weis-ippm-ioam-eth-
05.txt>.
[I-D.xzlnp-bier-ioam]
Min, X., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Nainar, N., and C. Pignataro,
"Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Encapsulation for
In-situ OAM (IOAM) Data", draft-xzlnp-bier-ioam-04 (work
in progress), July 2022, <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/
draft-xzlnp-bier-ioam-04.txt>.
[I-D.zhou-ippm-ioam-yang]
Zhou, T., Guichard, J., Brockners, F., and S. Raghavan, "A
YANG Data Model for In-Situ OAM", draft-zhou-ippm-ioam-
yang-08 (work in progress), July 2020,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-zhou-ippm-ioam-
yang-08.txt>.
[RFC2784] Farinacci, D., Li, T., Hanks, S., Meyer, D., Traina, P.,
and RFC Publisher, "Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)",
RFC 2784, DOI 10.17487/RFC2784, March 2000,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2784>.
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
[RFC5905] Mills, D., Martin, J., Ed., Burbank, J., Kasch, W., and
RFC Publisher, "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol
and Algorithms Specification", RFC 5905,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5905, June 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5905>.
[RFC7276] Mizrahi, T., Sprecher, N., Bellagamba, E., Weingarten, Y.,
and RFC Publisher, "An Overview of Operations,
Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Tools", RFC 7276,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7276, June 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7276>.
[RFC7384] Mizrahi, T. and RFC Publisher, "Security Requirements of
Time Protocols in Packet Switched Networks", RFC 7384,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7384, October 2014,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7384>.
[RFC7665] Halpern, J., Ed., Pignataro, C., Ed., and RFC Publisher,
"Service Function Chaining (SFC) Architecture", RFC 7665,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7665, October 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7665>.
[RFC7799] Morton, A. and RFC Publisher, "Active and Passive Metrics
and Methods (with Hybrid Types In-Between)", RFC 7799,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7799, May 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7799>.
[RFC8039] Shpiner, A., Tse, R., Schelp, C., Mizrahi, T., and RFC
Publisher, "Multipath Time Synchronization", RFC 8039,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8039, December 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8039>.
[RFC8279] Wijnands, IJ., Ed., Rosen, E., Ed., Dolganow, A.,
Przygienda, T., Aldrin, S., and RFC Publisher, "Multicast
Using Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER)", RFC 8279,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8279, November 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8279>.
[RFC8300] Quinn, P., Ed., Elzur, U., Ed., Pignataro, C., Ed., and
RFC Publisher, "Network Service Header (NSH)", RFC 8300,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8300, January 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8300>.
[RFC8799] Carpenter, B., Liu, B., and RFC Publisher, "Limited
Domains and Internet Protocols", RFC 8799,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8799, July 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8799>.
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
[RFC8915] Franke, D., Sibold, D., Teichel, K., Dansarie, M.,
Sundblad, R., and RFC Publisher, "Network Time Security
for the Network Time Protocol", RFC 8915,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8915, September 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8915>.
[RFC8926] Gross, J., Ed., Ganga, I., Ed., Sridhar, T., Ed., and RFC
Publisher, "Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization
Encapsulation", RFC 8926, DOI 10.17487/RFC8926, November
2020, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8926>.
[RFC9197] Brockners, F., Ed., Bhandari, S., Ed., Mizrahi, T., Ed.,
and RFC Publisher, "Data Fields for In Situ Operations,
Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM)", RFC 9197,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9197, May 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9197>.
[RFC9322] Mizrahi, T., Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Gafni, B.,
Spiegel, M., and RFC Publisher, "In Situ Operations,
Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active
Flags", RFC 9322, DOI 10.17487/RFC9322, November 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9322>.
[RFC9326] Song, H., Gafni, B., Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Mizrahi,
T., and RFC Publisher, "In Situ Operations,
Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Direct Exporting",
RFC 9326, DOI 10.17487/RFC9326, November 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9326>.
Authors' Addresses
Frank Brockners (editor)
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Hansaallee 249, 3rd Floor
DUESSELDORF, NORDRHEIN-WESTFALEN 40549
Germany
Email: fbrockne@cisco.com
Shwetha Bhandari (editor)
Thoughtspot
3rd Floor, Indiqube Orion, 24th Main Rd, Garden Layout, HSR Layout
Bangalore, KARNATAKA 560 102
India
Email: shwetha.bhandari@thoughtspot.com
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft In-situ OAM Deployment January 2023
Daniel Bernier
Bell Canada
Canada
Email: daniel.bernier@bell.ca
Tal Mizrahi (editor)
Huawei
8-2 Matam
Haifa 3190501
Israel
Email: tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com
Brockners, et al. Expires July 7, 2023 [Page 24]