%% You should probably cite rfc9342 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis/02/},
    author =    {Giuseppe Fioccola and Mauro Cociglio and Amedeo Sapio and Riccardo Sisto and Tianran Zhou},
    title =     {{Multipoint Alternate-Marking Clustered Method}},
    pagetotal = 29,
    year =      2022,
    month =     jun,
    day =       7,
    abstract =  {This document generalizes and expands Alternate-Marking methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network -- in wider terms, a multipoint-to- multipoint network. For this reason, the technique here described is called "Multipoint Alternate Marking". This document obsoletes RFC8889.},
}