%% You should probably cite rfc9342 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-04,
    number =    {draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-rfc8889bis/04/},
    author =    {Giuseppe Fioccola and Mauro Cociglio and Amedeo Sapio and Riccardo Sisto and Tianran Zhou},
    title =     {{Clustered Alternate-Marking Method}},
    pagetotal = 24,
    year =      2022,
    month =     sep,
    day =       26,
    abstract =  {This document generalizes and expands the Alternate-Marking methodology to measure any kind of unicast flow whose packets can follow several different paths in the network; this can result in a multipoint-to-multipoint network. The network clustering approach is presented and, for this reason, the technique described here is called "Clustered Alternate Marking". This document obsoletes RFC 8889.},
}