Skip to main content

Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions
draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-10

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, Yali Wang <wangyali11@huawei.com>, ippm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv@ietf.org, wangyali11@huawei.com, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-10.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol Optional Extensions'
  (draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-10.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the IP Performance Measurement Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Martin Duke and Magnus Westerlund.

A URL of this Internet Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This document describes optional extensions to Simple Two-way Active
   Measurement Protocol (STAMP) which enable measurement performance
   metrics in addition to ones supported by the STAMP base
   specification.  The document also defines a STAMP Test Session
   Identifier and thus updates RFC 8762. 

Working Group Summary

The document has gone through sufficient discussion within the IPPM WG and has working group consensus to publish. There was no particular controversy during the WG process.

Document Quality

The document has been a WG document for almost one year. It has been reviewed by the community within the IPPM WG and gone through several updates.  There was quite a bit of work in Last Call on the error cases.

Personnel

The shepherd is Yali Wang. The Responsible AD is Martin Duke.

The registry in this document uses First Come First Served and IETF Review policies, so no Designated Expert is required.

RFC Editor Note