Information Model and XML Data Model for Traceroute Measurements
draft-ietf-ippm-storetraceroutes-12
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 5388.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Juergen Quittek , Martin Swany , Thomas Dietz , Sandra Tartarelli , Saverio Niccolini | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2008-10-23) | ||
| Replaces | draft-niccolini-ippm-storetraceroutes | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 5388 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Lars Eggert | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-ippm-storetraceroutes-12
IPPM Working Group S. Niccolini
Internet-Draft S. Tartarelli
Intended status: Standards Track J. Quittek
Expires: April 26, 2009 T. Dietz
NEC
M. Swany
UDel
October 23, 2008
Information Model and XML Data Model for Traceroute Measurements
draft-ietf-ippm-storetraceroutes-12
Status of this Memo
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware
have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes
aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 26, 2009.
Abstract
This document describes a standard way to store the configuration and
the results of traceroute measurements. This document first of all
describes the terminology used in this document and the traceroute
tool itself; afterwards, the common information model is defined
dividing the information elements in two semantically separated
groups (configuration elements and results elements). Moreover an
additional element is defined to relate configuration elements and
results elements by means of a common unique identifier. On the
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
basis of the information model a data model based on XML is defined
to store the results of traceroute measurements.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Terminology used in this document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. The Traceroute tool and its operations . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Results of traceroute measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Information Model for Traceroute Measurements . . . . . . . . 5
5.1. Data Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5.2. Information Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
5.2.1. Relationship between the Information Elements . . . . 7
5.2.2. Configuration Information Elements . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.2.3. Results Information Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.2.4. Information Element Correlating Configuration and
Results Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.2.5. Information Elements to compare traceroute
measurements results one with each other . . . . . . . 18
6. Data Model for Storing Traceroute Measurements . . . . . . . . 19
7. XML Schema for traceroute Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
8.1. Conducting Traceroute Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
8.2. Securing Traceroute Measurements Information . . . . . . . 36
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Appendix A. Traceroute Default Configuration Parameters . . . . . 38
A.1. Alternative Traceroute Implementations . . . . . . . . . . 42
Appendix B. Known Problems with Traceroute . . . . . . . . . . . 42
B.1. Compatibility between traceroute measurements results
and IPPM metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Appendix C. Differences to DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB . . . . . . . . 43
C.1. Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
C.2. Naming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
C.3. Semantics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
C.4. Additional Information Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Appendix D. Traceroute Examples with XML representation . . . . . 46
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . . . 72
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
1. Introduction
Traceroutes are being used by lots of measurement efforts, either as
an independent measurement or to get path information to support
other measurement efforts. That is why there is the need to
standardize the way the configuration and the results of traceroute
measurements are stored. The standard metrics defined by the IPPM
working group in matter of delay, connectivity and losses do not
apply to the metrics returned by the traceroute tool; therefore, in
order to compare results of traceroute measurements, the only
possibility is to add to the stored results a specification of the
operating system as well as name and version for the traceroute tool
used. This document, in order to store results of traceroute
measurements and allow comparison of them, defines a standard way to
store them using a XML schema. The document is organized as follows:
Section 2 defines the terminology used in this document, Section 3
describes the traceroute tool, Section 4 describes the results of a
traceroute measurement as displayed to the screen from which the
traceroute tool was launched. Section 5 and Section 6 respectively
describe the information model and data model for storing
configuration and results of the traceroute measurements. Section 7
contains the XML schema to be used as a template for storing and/or
exchanging traceroute measurements information. The document ends
with security considerations and IANA considerations in Section 8 and
Section 9 respectively.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. Terminology used in this document
The terminology used in this document is defined as follow:
o traceroute tool: a software tool for network diagnostic behaving
as described in Section 3;
o traceroute measurement: an instance of the traceroute tool
launched, with specific configuration parameters (traceroute
measurement configuration parameters), from a specific host
(initiator of the traceroute measurement) giving as output
specific traceroute measurement results;
o traceroute probe: one of many IP packets send out by the
traceroute tool during a traceroute measurement;
o traceroute measurement configuration parameters: the configuration
parameters of a traceroute measurement;
o traceroute measurement results: the results of a traceroute
measurement;
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o traceroute measurement information: both the results and the
configuration parameters of a traceroute measurement;
o traceroute measurement path: a sequence of hosts transited in
order by traceroute probes during a traceroute measurement;
3. The Traceroute tool and its operations
Traceroute is a network diagnostic tool used to determine the hop by
hop path from a source to a destination and the Round Trip Time (RTT)
from the source to each hop. Traceroute can be therefore used to
discover some information (hop counts, delays, etc.) about the path
between the initiator of the traceroute measurement and other hosts.
Typically, the traceroute tool attempts to discover the path to a
destination by sending UDP probes with specific time-to-live (TTL)
values in the IP packet header and trying to elicit an ICMP
TIME_EXCEEDED response from each gateway along the path to some host.
More in detail, a first set of probes with TTL equal to 1 are sent by
the traceroute tool from the host initiating the traceroute
measurement (some tool implementations allow setting the initial TTL
to a value equal to "n" different from 1, so that the first "n-1"
hops are skipped and the first hop that will be traced is the "n-th"
in the path). Upon receiving a probe, the first hop host decreases
the TTL value (by one or more). By observing a TTL value equal to
zero, the host rejects the probe and typically returns an ICMP
message with a TIME_EXCEEDED value. The traceroute tool can
therefore derive the IP address of the first hop from the header of
the ICMP message and evaluate the RTT between the host initiating the
traceroute measurement and the first hop. The next hops are
discovered following the same procedure, taking care of increasing at
each step the TTL value of the probes by one. The TTL value is
increased until either an ICMP PORT_UNREACHABLE message is received,
meaning that the destination host has been reached, or the maximum
configured number of hops has been hit.
Some implementations, use ICMP Echoes, instead of UDP datagrams.
However, many routers do not return ICMP messages about ICMP
messages, i.e. no ICMP TIME_EXCEEDED is returned for an ICMP Echo.
Therefore, this document recommends to base implementations on UDP
datagrams. Considerations on TCP-based implementations of the
traceroute tool are reported in Appendix A.1.
4. Results of traceroute measurements
The following list reports the information fields provided as results
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
by all traceroute tool implementations considered. The order in
which they are reported here is not relevant and it changes in
different implementations. For each hop the information reported is:
o the hop index;
o the host symbolic address, provided that at least one of the
probes received a response, the symbolic address could be resolved
at the corresponding host and that the option to display only
numerical addresses was not set;
o the host IP address, provided that at least one of the probes
received a response;
o the RTT for each response to a probe.
Depending on the traceroute tool implementation, additional
information might be displayed in the output (for instance MPLS-
related information).
It might happen that some probes do not receive a response within the
configured time-out (for instance if the probe is filtered out by a
firewall). In this case, an "*" is displayed in place of the RTT.
The information model reflects this using a string with the value of
"RoundTripTimeNotAvailable" meaning either the probe was lost because
of a time-out or it was not possible to transmit a probe. It may
also happen that some implementations print the same line multiple
times when a router decreases the TTL by more than one looking like
multiple hops, the information model is not impacted by this since
each line is handled separately and it is left to the applications
handling the XML file how to deal with it. Moreover, for delays
below 1 ms, some implementations reports 0 ms (e.g. UNIX and LINUX)
while WINDOWS tracert reports "< 1 ms".
5. Information Model for Traceroute Measurements
The information model is composed of information elements; for
defining these information elements, a template is used. Such
template is specified in the list below:
o name - A unique and meaningful name for the information element.
The preferred spelling for the name is to use mixed case if the
name is compound, with an initial lower case letter, e.g.,
"sourceIpAddress".
o description - The semantics of this information element.
o dataType - One of the types listed in Section 5.1 of this document
or in an extension of the information model. The type space for
attributes is constrained to facilitate implementation.
o units - If the element is a measure of some kind, the units
identify what the measure is.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
5.1. Data Types
This section describes the set of basic valid data types of the
information model.
o String - The type "String" represents a finite length string of
valid characters from the Unicode character encoding set. Unicode
allows for ASCII and many other international character sets to be
used. It is expected that strings will be encoded in UTF-8
format, which is identical in encoding for USASCII characters, but
also accommodates other Unicode multi-byte characters.
o String255 - Same type as "String" but with the restriction to 255
characters.
o InetAddressType - The type "InetAddressType" represents a type of
Internet address. The allowed values are to be intended as
imported from [RFC4001] (where the intent was to import only some
of the values); additional allowed value are "asnumber" and
"noSpecification".
o InetAddress - The type "InetAddress" denotes a generic Internet
address. The allowed values are imported from [RFC4001] (the
values imported are unknown, ipv4, ipv6 and dns), while non-global
IPv4/IPv6 addresses (e.g. ipv4z and ipv6z) were excluded; an
additional allowed value is the AS number to be indicated as the
actual number plus the indication how the mapping from IP address
to AS number was performed. "unknown" is used to indicate an IP
address that is not in one of the formats defined.
o ipASNumberMappingType - The type "ipASNumberMappingType"
represents a type of mapping from IP to AS number, it indicated
the method that was used to do get the mapping (allowed values are
"bgptables", "routingregistries", "nslookup", "others" or
"unknown").
o Boolean - The type "boolean" represents a Boolean value according
to XML standards [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028].
o UnsignedInt - The type "UnsignedInt" represents a value in the
range (0..4294967295).
o UnsignedShort - The type "UnsignedShort" represents a value in the
range (0..65535).
o UnsignedByte - The type "UnsignedByte" represents a value in the
range (0..255).
o u8nonzero - The type "u8nonzero" represents a value in the range
(1..255).
o ProbesType - The type "ProbesType" represents a way of indicating
the protocol used for the traceroute probes. Values defined in
this document are UDP, TCP and ICMP.
o OperationResponseStatus - The type "OperationResponseStatus" is
used to report the result of an operation. The allowed values are
to be intended as imported from [RFC4560].
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o dateTime - The type "dateTime" represents a date-time
specification according to XML standards
[W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] but restricted to the values
defined in [RFC3339].
5.2. Information Elements
This section describes the elements related to the storing of a
traceroute measurement. The elements are grouped in two groups
(Configuration and Results) according to their semantics. In order
to relate configuration and results elements by means of a common
unique identifier, an additional element is defined belonging to both
the two groups.
5.2.1. Relationship between the Information Elements
Every traceroute measurement is represented by an instance of the
"traceRoute" element. This class provides a standardized
representation for traceroute measurement data. The "traceroute"
element is an element that can be composed of (depending on the
nature of the traceroute measurement):
o 1 optional "RequestMetadata" element;
o 0..4294967295 "Measurement" elements;
Each "Measurement" element contains:
o 1 optional "MeasurementMetadata" element;
o 0..4294967295 "MeasurementResult" elements;
The "RequestMetadata" element can be used for specifying parameters
of a traceroute measurement to be performed at one or more nodes by
one or more traceroute implementations. Depending on the
capabilities of a traceroute implementation, not all requested
parameters can be applied. Which parameters have actually been
applied by for specific traceroute measurement is specified in a
"MeasurementMetadata" element.
The "RequestMetadata" element is a sequence that contains:
o 1 "TestName" element;
o 1 optional "ToolVersion" element;
o 1 optional "ToolName" element;
o 1 "CtlTargetAddress" element;
o 1 optional "CtlBypassRouteTable" element;
o 1 optional "CtlProbeDataSize" element;
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o 1 optional "CtlTimeOut" element;
o 1 optional "CtlProbesPerHop" element;
o 1 optional "CtlPort" element;
o 1 optional "CtlMaxTtl" element;
o 1 optional "CtlDSField" element;
o 1 optional "CtlSourceAddress" element;
o 1 optional "CtlIfIndex" element;
o 1 optional "CtlMiscOptions" element;
o 1 optional "CtlMaxFailures" element;
o 1 optional "CtlDontFragment" element;
o 1 optional "CtlInitialTtl" element;
o 1 optional "CtlDescr" element;
o 1 "CtlType" element;
If the "RequestMetadata" element is omitted from an XML file then it
means that the traceroute measurement configuration parameters
requested were all used and the "MeasurementMetadata" element list
them in detail.
The "MeasurementMetadata" element is a sequence that contains:
o 1 "TestName" element;
o 1 "OSName" element;
o 1 "OSVersion" element;
o 1 "ToolVersion" element;
o 1 "ToolName" element;
o 1 "CtlTargetAddressType" element;
o 1 "CtlTargetAddress" element;
o 1 "CtlBypassRouteTable" element;
o 1 "CtlProbeDataSize" element;
o 1 "CtlTimeOut" element;
o 1 "CtlProbesPerHop" element;
o 1 "CtlPort" element;
o 1 "CtlMaxTtl" element;
o 1 "CtlDSField" element;
o 1 "CtlSourceAddressType" element;
o 1 "CtlSourceAddress" element;
o 1 "CtlIfIndex" element;
o 1 optional "CtlMiscOptions" element;
o 1 "CtlMaxFailures" element;
o 1 "CtlDontFragment" element;
o 1 "CtlInitialTtl" element;
o 1 optional "CtlDescr" element;
o 1 "CtlType" element;
Configuration Information Elements can describe not just traceroute
measurements that have already happened ("MeasurementMetadata"
elements), but also configuration to be used when requesting a
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
measurement to be made ("RequestMetadata" element). This is quite
different semantically, even if the individual information elements
are similar. Due to this similarity both "RequestMetadata" as well
as "MeasurementMetadata" are represented by the same type in the XML
schema. All elements that are missing from the "RequestMetadata" or
marked as optional in the "RequestMetadata" but mandatory in the
"MeasurementMetadata" must be specified as empty elements.
Specifying them as empty elements means use the default value. The
"CtlType" element could have been optional in the "RequestMetadata"
but since default values cannot be specified for complex types in an
XML schema the element is mandatory also in the "RequestMetadata".
The "MeasurementResult" element is a sequence that contains:
o 1 "TestName" element;
o 1 "ResultsStartDateAndTime" element;
o 1 "ResultsIpTgtAddrType" element;
o 1 "ResultsIpTgtAddr" element;
o 1 "ProbeResults" elements;
o 1 "ResultsEndDateAndTime" element;
Additionally it is important to say that each "ProbeResults" element
is a sequence that contains:
o 1..255 "hop" elements;
Each "hop" element is a sequence that contains
o 1..10 "probe" elements;
o 1 optional "HopRawOutputData" element;
Each "probe" element contains:
o 1 "HopAddrType" element;
o 1 "HopAddr" element;
o 1 optional "HopName" element;
o 0..255 optional "MPLSLabelStackEntry" elements;
o 1 "ProbedRoundTripTime" element;
o 1 "ResponseStatus" element;
o 1 "Time" element;
Different numbers of appearances of the three basic elements in the
XML file are meant for different scopes:
o a file with only 1 "RequestMetadata" element represents a file
containing the traceroute measurement configuration parameters of
a traceroute measurement, it can be used to distribute the
traceroute measurement configuration parameters over multiple
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
nodes asked to run the same traceroute measurement;
o a file with 1 "Measurement element containing 1
"MeasurementMetadata" and 1 "MeasurementResult" element represents
a file containing the traceroute measurement information of a
traceroute measurement;
o a file with 1 "Measurement element containing 1
"MeasurementMetadata" and n "MeasurementResult" elements
represents a file containing the traceroute measurement
information of a set of traceroute measurements run over different
times with always the same traceroute measurement configuration
parameters;
o a file with 1 "RequestMetadata" and 1 "Measurement element
containing 1 "MeasurementMetadata" and 1 "Measurement" element
represents a file containing the traceroute measurement
information of a traceroute measurement (containing both the
requested traceroute measurement configuration parameters and the
ones actually used);
o other combinations are possible to store multiple traceroute
measurements all in one XML file.
5.2.2. Configuration Information Elements
This section describes the elements specific to the configuration of
the traceroute measurement (belonging to both "RequestMetadata" and
"MeasurementMetadata" elements).
5.2.2.1. CtlTargetAddressType
o name - CtlTargetAddressType
o description - Specifies the type of address in the corresponding
CtlTargetAddress element. This element is not directly reflected
in the XML Schema of Section 7. The host address type can be
determined by examining the inetAddress type name and the
corresponding element value.
o dataType - InetAddressType
o units - N/A
5.2.2.2. CtlTargetAddress
o name - CtlTargetAddress
o description - In the "RequestMetadata" element it specifies the
host address requested to be used in the traceroute measurement.
In the "MeasurementMetadata" element it specifies the host address
used in the traceroute measurement.
o dataType - InetAddress
o units - N/A
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
5.2.2.3. CtlBypassRouteTable
o name - CtlBypassRouteTable
o description - In the "RequestMetadata" element specifies if it is
requested to enable the optional bypassing of the route table or
not. In the "MeasurementMetadata" element, specifies if the
optional bypassing of the route table was enabled or not. If
enabled, the normal routing tables will be bypassed and the probes
will be sent directly to a host on an attached network. If the
host is not on a directly-attached network, an error is returned.
This option can be used to perform the traceroute measurement to a
local host through an interface that has no route defined. This
object can be used when the setsockopt SOL_SOCKET SO_DONTROUTE
option is supported and set (see [IEEE.1003-1G.1997]).
o dataType - Boolean
o units - N/A
5.2.2.4. CtlProbeDataSize
o name - CtlProbeDataSize
o description - Specifies the size of the probes of a traceroute
measurement in octets (requested if in the "RequestMetadata"
element, actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element).
If UDP datagrams are used as probes, then the value contained in
this object is exact. If another protocol is used to transmit
probes (i.e. TCP or ICMP) for which the specified size is not
appropriate, then the implementation can use whatever size
(appropriate to the method) is closest to the specified size. The
maximum value for this object was computed by subtracting the
smallest possible IP header size of 20 octets (IPv4 header with no
options) and the UDP header size of 8 octets from the maximum IP
packet size. An IP packet has a maximum size of 65535 octets
(excluding IPv6 Jumbograms).
o dataType - UnsignedShort
o units - octets
5.2.2.5. CtlTimeOut
o name - CtlTimeOut
o description - Specifies the time-out value, in seconds, for each
probe of a traceroute measurement (requested if in the
"RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element).
o dataType - UnsignedByte
o units - seconds
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
5.2.2.6. CtlProbesPerHop
o name - CtlProbesPerHop
o description - Specifies the number of probes with the same time-
to-live (TTL) value that are sent for each host (requested if in
the "RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element).
o dataType - UnsignedByte
o units - probes
5.2.2.7. CtlPort
o name - CtlPort
o description - Specifies the base port used by the traceroute
measurement (requested if in the "RequestMetadata" element,
actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element).
o dataType - UnsignedShort
o units - port number
5.2.2.8. CtlMaxTtl
o name - CtlMaxTtl
o description - Specifies the maximum TTL value for the traceroute
measurement (requested if in the "RequestMetadata" element,
actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element).
o dataType - u8nonzero
o units - time-to-live value
5.2.2.9. CtlDSField
o name - CtlDSField
o description - Specifies the value that was requested to be stored
in the Differentiated Services (DS) field in the traceroute probe
(if in the "RequestMetadata" element). Specifies the value that
was stored in the Differentiated Services (DS) field in the
traceroute probe (if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element). The
DS Field is defined as the Type of Service (TOS) octet in a IPv4
header or as the Traffic Class octet in a IPv6 header (see section
7 of [RFC2460]). The value of this object must be a decimal
integer in the range from 0 to 255. This option can be used to
determine what effect an explicit DS field setting has on a
traceroute measurement and its probes. Not all values are legal
or meaningful. Useful TOS octet values are probably '16' (low
delay) and '8' (high throughput). Further references can be found
in [RFC2474] for the definition of the Differentiated Services
(DS) field and to [RFC1812] Section 5.3.2 for Type of Service
(TOS).
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o dataType - UnsignedByte
o units - N/A
5.2.2.10. CtlSourceAddressType
o name - CtlSourceAddressType
o description - Specifies the type of address in the corresponding
CtlSourceAddress element. This element is not directly reflected
in the XML Schema of Section 7. The host address type can be
determined by examining the inetAddress type name and the
corresponding element value. DNS names are not allowed for the
CtlSourceAddress.
o dataType - InetAddressType
o units - N/A
5.2.2.11. CtlSourceAddress
o name - CtlSourceAddress
o description - Specifies the IP address (which has to be given as
an IP number, not a hostname) as the source address in traceroute
probes (requested if in the "RequestMetadata" element, actually
used if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element). On hosts with more
than one IP address, this option can be used in "RequestMetadata"
element to force the source address to be something other than the
primary IP address of the interface the probe is sent on; the
value "unknown" means the default address will be used.
o dataType - InetAddress
o units - N/A
5.2.2.12. CtlIfIndex
o name - CtlIfIndex
o description - Specifies the interface index as defined in
[RFC2863] that is requested to be used in the traceroute
measurement for sending the traceroute probes (if in the
"RequestMetadata" element). A value of 0 in the "RequestMetadata"
indicates that no specific interface is requested. Specifies the
one actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element.
o dataType - UnsignedInt
o units - N/A
5.2.2.13. CtlMiscOptions
o name - CtlMiscOptions
o description - Specifies implementation dependent options
(requested if in the "RequestMetadata" element, actually used if
in the "MeasurementMetadata" element).
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o dataType - String255
o units - N/A
5.2.2.14. CtlMaxFailures
o name - CtlMaxFailures
o description - Specifies the maximum number of consecutive timeouts
allowed before terminating a traceroute measurement (requested if
in the "RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element). A value of either 255 (maximum
hop count/possible TTL value) or a 0 indicates that the function
of terminating a remote traceroute measurement when a specific
number of consecutive timeouts are detected was disabled. This
element is included to give full compatibility with [RFC4560]. No
known implementation of traceroute currently supports it.
o dataType - Unsigned8
o units - timeouts
5.2.2.15. CtlDontFragment
o name - CtlDontFragment
o description - Specifies if the don't fragment flag (DF) in the IP
header for a probe was enabled or not (if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element). If in the "RequestMetadata", it
specifies if the flag was requested to be enable or not. Setting
the DF flag can be used for performing a manual PATH MTU test.
o dataType - Boolean
o units - N/A
5.2.2.16. CtlInitialTtl
o name - CtlInitialTtl
o description - Specifies the initial TTL value for a traceroute
measurement (requested if in the "RequestMetadata" element,
actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element). Such TTL
setting is intended to bypass the initial (often well known)
portion of a path.
o dataType - u8nonzero
o units - N/A
5.2.2.17. CtlDescr
o name - CtlDescr
o description - The purpose of this element is to provide a
description of the traceroute measurement.
o dataType - String255
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o units - N/A
5.2.2.18. CtlType
o name - CtlType
o description - Specifies the implementation method used for the
traceroute measurement (requested if in the "RequestMetadata"
element, actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element).
It specifies if the traceroute is using TCP, UDP, ICMP or other
type of probes. It is possible to specify other types of probes
by using an element specified in another schema with a different
namespace.
o dataType - ProbesType
o units - N/A
5.2.3. Results Information Elements
This section describes the elements specific to the results of the
traceroute measurement.
5.2.3.1. ResultsStartDateAndTime
o name - ResultsStartDateAndTime
o description - Specifies the date and start time of the traceroute
measurement. This is the time when the first probe was seen at
the sending interface.
o dataType - DateTime
o units - N/A
5.2.3.2. ResultsIpTgtAddrType
o name - ResultsIpTgtAddrType
o description - Specifies the type of address in the corresponding
ResultsIpTgtAddr element. This element is not directly reflected
in the XML Schema of Section 7. The host address type can be
determined by examining the inetAddress type name and the
corresponding element value.
o dataType - InetAddressType
o units - N/A
5.2.3.3. ResultsIpTgtAddr
o name - ResultsIpTgtAddr
o description - Specifies the IP address associated with a
CtlTargetAddress value when the destination address is specified
as a DNS name. The value of this object should be "unknown" if a
DNS name is not specified or when a specified DNS name fails to
resolve.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o dataType - InetAddress
o units - N/A
5.2.3.4. HopAddrType
o name - HopAddrType
o description - Specifies the type of address in the corresponding
HopAddr element. This element is not directly reflected in the
XML Schema of Section 7. The host address type can be determined
by examining the inetAddress type name and the corresponding
element value. DNS names are not allowed for HopAddr.
o dataType - InetAddressType
o units - N/A
5.2.3.5. HopAddr
o name - HopAddr
o description - Specifies the address of a hop in the traceroute
measurement path. This object is not allowed to be a DNS name.
o dataType - InetAddress
o units - N/A
5.2.3.6. HopName
o name - HopName
o description - Specifies the DNS name of the HopAddr if it is
available. If it is not available the element is omitted.
o dataType - InetAddress
o units - N/A
5.2.3.7. MPLSLabelStackEntry
o name - MPLSLabelStackEntry
o description - Specifies entries of the MPLS label stack of a probe
observed when the probe arrived at the hop that replied to the
probe. This object contains one MPLS label stack entry as 32 bit
value as it is observed on the MPLS label stack. Contained in
this single number are the MPLS label, the Exp field, the S flag,
and the MPLS TTL value as specified in [RFC3032]. If more than
one MPLS label stack entry is reported then multiple instances of
elements of this type are used. They must be ordered in the same
order as on the label stack with the top label stack entry being
reported first.
o dataType - UnsignedInt
o units - N/A
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
5.2.3.8. ProbeRoundTripTime
o name - ProbeRoundTripTime
o description - If this element contains the element roundTripTime
this specifies the amount of time measured in milliseconds from
when a probe was sent to when its response was received or when it
timed out. The value of this element is reported as the
truncation of the number reported by the traceroute tool (the
output "< 1 ms" is therefore encoded as 0 ms). If it contains the
element "roundTripTimeNotAvaiable" it means either the probe was
lost because of a timeout or it was not possible to transmit a
probe.
o dataType - UnsignedShort or String
o units - milliseconds or N/A
5.2.3.9. ResponseStatus
o name - ResponseStatus
o description - Specifies the result of a traceroute measurement
made by the host for a particular probe.
o dataType - OperationResponseStatus
o units - N/A
5.2.3.10. Time
o name - Time
o description - Specifies the timestamp for the time the response to
the probe was received at the interface.
o dataType - DateTime
o units - N/A
5.2.3.11. ResultsEndDateAndTime
o name - ResultsEndDateAndTime
o description - Specifies the date and end time of the traceroute
measurement. It is either the time when the response to the last
probe of the traceroute measurement was received or the time when
the last probe of the traceroute measurement was sent plus the
relative timeout (in case of missing response).
o dataType - DateTime
o units - N/A
5.2.3.12. HopRawOutputData
o name - HopRawOutputData
o description - Specifies the raw output data returned by the
traceroute measurement for a certain hop in a traceroute
measurement path. It is an implementation-dependant printable
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
string, expected to be useful for a human interpreting the
traceroute results.
o dataType - String
o units - N/A
5.2.4. Information Element Correlating Configuration and Results
Elements
This section defines an additional element belonging to both the two
previous groups (configuration elements and result elements) named
TestName. This element is defined in order to relate configuration
elements and results ones by means of a common unique identifier (to
be chosen in accordance to the specification of [RFC4560]).
5.2.4.1. TestName
o name - TestName
o description - Specifies the name of a traceroute measurement.
This is not necessarily unique, within any well-defined scope
(e.g. a specific host, initiator of the traceroute measurement).
o dataType - String255
o units - N/A
5.2.5. Information Elements to compare traceroute measurements results
one with each other
This section defines additional elements belonging to both the two
previous groups (configuration elements and result elements); these
elements were defined in order to allow traceroute measurements
results comparison among different traceroute measurements.
5.2.5.1. OSName
o name - OSName
o description - Specifies the name of the operating system on which
the traceroute measurement was launched. This element is ignored
if used in the "RequestMetadata".
o dataType - String255
o units - N/A
5.2.5.2. OSVersion
o name - OSVersion
o description - Specifies the OS version on which the traceroute
measurement was launched. This element is ignored if used in the
"RequestMetadata".
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o dataType - String255
o units - N/A
5.2.5.3. ToolVersion
o name - ToolVersion
o description - Specifies the version of the traceroute tool
(requested to be used if in the "RequestMetadata" element,
actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element).
o dataType - String255
o units - N/A
5.2.5.4. ToolName
o name - ToolName
o description - Specifies the name of the traceroute tool (requested
to be used if in the "RequestMetadata" element, actually used if
in the "MeasurementMetadata" element).
o dataType - String255
o units - N/A
6. Data Model for Storing Traceroute Measurements
For storing and transmitting information according to the information
model defined in the previous section, a data model is required that
specifies how to encode the elements of the information model.
There are several design choices for a data model. It can use a
binary or textual representation and it can be defined from scratch
or use already existing frameworks and data models. In general, the
use of already existing frameworks and models should be preferred.
Binary and textual representation both have advantages and
disadvantages. Textual representations are (with some limitations)
human readable while a binary representation consumes less resources
for storing, transmitting and parsing data.
An already existing and closely related data model is the DISMAN-
TRACEROUTE-MIB module [RFC4560], that specifies a SMIv2 encoding of
[RFC2578], [RFC2579] and [RFC2580] for transmitting traceroute
measurement information (configuration and results). This data model
is well suited and supported within network management systems, but
as a general format for storing and transmitting traceroute results
it is not easily applicable.
Another binary representation would be an extension of traffic flow
information encodings as specified for the IPFIX protocol [RFC5101],
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
[RFC5102]. The IPFIX protocol is extensible. However, the
architecture behind this protocol [I-D.ietf-ipfix-architecture] is
targeted at exporting passively measured flow information.
Therefore, some obstacles are expected when trying to use it for
transmitting traceroute measurements information.
For textual representations, using the eXtensible Markup Language
(XML) [W3C.REC-xml-20060816] is an obvious choice. XML supports
clean structuring of data and syntax checking of records. With some
limitations it is human readable. It is supported well by a huge
pool of tools and standards for generating, transmitting, parsing and
converting it to other data formats. Its disadvantages is the
resource consumption for processing, storing, and transmitting
information. Since the expected data volumes related to traceroute
measurements in network operation and maintenance is not expected to
be extremely high, the inefficient usage of resources is not a
significant disadvantage. Therefore, XML was chosen as basis for the
traceroute measurements information model that is specified in this
section.
Section 7 contains the XML schema to be used as a template for
storing and/or exchanging traceroute measurements information. The
schema was designed in order to use an extensible approach based on
templates (pretty similar to how IPFIX protocol is designed) where
the traceroute configuration elements (both the requested parameters,
Request, and the actual parameters used, MeasurementMetadata) are
meta data to be referenced by results information elements (data) by
means of the TestName element (used as unique identifier, chosen in
accordance to the specification of [RFC4560]). Currently Open Grid
Forum (OGF) is also using this approach and cross-requirements have
been analyzed. As a result of this analysis the XML schema contained
in Section 7 is compatible with OGF schema since it was designed in a
way that both limits the unnecessary redundancy and a simple one-to-
one transformation between the two exist.
7. XML Schema for traceroute Measurements
This section presents the XML schema to be used as a template for
storing and/or exchanging traceroute measurements information. The
schema uses UTF-8 encoding defined in [RFC3629]. In documents
conforming to the format presented here an XML declaration SHOULD be
present specifying the version and the character encoding of the XML
document. The document should be encoded using UTF-8. Since some of
the strings can span multiple lines [RFC5198] applies. XML
processing instructions and comments MUST be ignored. Mind that
whitespace is significant in XML when writing documents conforming to
this schema. Documents using the presented format must be valid
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
according to the XML schema shown in this section. This includes all
elements. Since elements of type _CtlType may contain elements from
unknown namespaces those elements MUST be ignored if their namespace
is unknown to the processor. Values for elements using the XML
schema type dateTime MUST be restricted to values defined in
[RFC3339]. Future versions of this format MAY extend this schema by
creating a new schema that redefines all or parts of the data types
and elements defined in this version or by establishing a complete
new schema.
Due to the limited line length some lines appear wrapped.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:traceroute-1.0"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:tr="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:traceroute-1.0">
<xs:simpleType name="string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>String restricted to 255
characters.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="255"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="u8nonzero">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>usginedByte with non zero
value.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedByte">
<xs:minInclusive value="1"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:complexType name="_roundTripTime">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="roundTripTime">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedInt"/>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="roundTripTimeNotAvailable">
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<xs:complexType/>
</xs:element>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="_inetAddressUnknown"/>
<xs:simpleType name="_inetAddressIpv4">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:pattern value="(([1-9]?[0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5
]).){3}([1-9]?[0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="_inetAddressIpv6">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:pattern value="(([\dA-Fa-f]{1,4}:){7}[\dA-Fa-f]{1,4})(:([\d
]{1,3}.){3}[\d]{1,3})?"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="_inetAddressDns">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:maxLength value="256"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:complexType name="_inetAddressASNumber">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the AS number of a hop in the
traceroute path as a 32 bit number and the indication how the
mapping from IP address to AS number was
performed.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="asNumber" type="xs:unsignedInt"/>
<xs:element name="ipASNumberMappingType">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration value="bgptables"/>
<xs:enumeration value="routingregistries"/>
<xs:enumeration value="nslookup"/>
<xs:enumeration value="others"/>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<xs:enumeration value="unknown"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="inetAddress">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="inetAddressUnknown"
type="tr:_inetAddressUnknown"/>
<xs:element name="inetAddressIpv4" type="tr:_inetAddressIpv4"/>
<xs:element name="inetAddressIpv6" type="tr:_inetAddressIpv6"/>
<xs:element name="inetAddressASNumber"
type="tr:_inetAddressASNumber"/>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" name="inetAddressDns"
type="tr:_inetAddressDns"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="inetAddressWithoutDns">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="inetAddressUnknown"
type="tr:_inetAddressUnknown"/>
<xs:element name="inetAddressIpv4"
type="tr:_inetAddressIpv4"/>
<xs:element name="inetAddressIpv6"
type="tr:_inetAddressIpv6"/>
<xs:element name="inetAddressASNumber"
type="tr:_inetAddressASNumber"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:simpleType name="operationResponseStatus">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:enumeration value="responseReceived"/>
<xs:enumeration value="unknown"/>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<xs:enumeration value="internalError"/>
<xs:enumeration value="requestTimedOut"/>
<xs:enumeration value="unknownDestinationAddress"/>
<xs:enumeration value="noRouteToTarget"/>
<xs:enumeration value="interfaceInactiveToTarget"/>
<xs:enumeration value="arpFailure"/>
<xs:enumeration value="maxConcurrentLimitReached"/>
<xs:enumeration value="unableToResolveDnsName"/>
<xs:enumeration value="invalidHostAddress"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:complexType name="_CtlType">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="TCP">
<xs:complexType/>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="UDP">
<xs:complexType/>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="ICMP">
<xs:complexType/>
</xs:element>
<xs:any namespace="##other"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="_ProbeResults">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element maxOccurs="255" name="hop">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element maxOccurs="10" name="probe">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="HopAddr"
type="tr:inetAddressWithoutDns">
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the address of a
hop in the traceroute measurement path. This
object is not allowed to be a DNS name. The
address type can be determined by examining the
inetAddress type name and the corresponding
element value.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" name="HopName"
type="tr:_inetAddressDns">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the DNS name of
the HopAddress if it is available. If it is
not available the element is
omitted.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element maxOccurs="255" minOccurs="0"
name="MPLSLabelStackEntry">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies entries of the
MPLS label stack of a probe observed when the
probe arrived at the hop that replied to the
probe. This object contains one MPLS label
stack entry as 32 bit value as it is observed
on the MPLS label stack. Contained in this
single number are the MPLS label, the Exp
field, the S flag, and the MPLS TTL value as
specified in [RFC3032]. If more than one MPLS
label stack entry is reported then multiple
instances of elements of this type are used.
They must be ordered in the same order as on
the label stack with the top label stack
entry being reported
first.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedInt">
<xs:maxInclusive value="4294967295"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="ProbeRoundTripTime"
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
type="tr:_roundTripTime">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>If this element contains
the element roundTripTime this specifies the
amount of time measured in milliseconds from
when a probe was sent to when its response
was received or when it timed out. The value
of this element is reported as the truncation
of the number reported by the traceroute tool
(the output "< 1 ms" is therefore encoded
as 0 ms). If it contains the element
"roundTripTimeNotAvaiable" it means either
the probe was lost because of a timeout or it
was not possible to transmit a
probe.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="ResponseStatus"
type="tr:operationResponseStatus">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the result of a
traceroute measurement made by the host for a
particular probe.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="Time" type="xs:dateTime">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the timestamp for
the time the response to the probe was
received at the interface.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" name="HopRawOutputData"
type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the raw output data
returned by the traceroute measurement for a
certain hop in a traceroute measurement path. It is
an implementation-dependant printable string,
expected to be useful for a human interpreting the
traceroute results.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="_Metadata">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the metadata for a traceroute
operation. The parameters requested if used in
"RequestMetadata" or the actual parameters used if used in
"MeasurementMetadata".</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="TestName" type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the name of a traceroute
measurement. This is not necessarily unique, within any
well-defined scope (e.g. a specific host, initiator of
the traceroute measurement).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="" name="OSName" type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the name of the operating
system on which the traceroute measurement was launched.
This element is ignored if used in the
"RequestMetadata".</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="" name="OSVersion" type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the OS version on which the
traceroute measurement was launched. This element is
ignored if used in the
"RequestMetadata".</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="" name="ToolVersion" type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the version of the traceroute
tool (requested to be used if in the "RequestMetadata"
element, actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata"
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
element).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="" name="ToolName" type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the name of the traceroute
tool (requested to be used if in the "RequestMetadata"
element, actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata"
element).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="CtlTargetAddress" type="tr:inetAddress">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>In the "RequestMetadata" element it
specifies the host address requested to be used in the
traceroute measurement. In the "MeasurementMetadata"
element it specifies the host address used in the
traceroute measurement. The host address type can be
determined by the examining the inetAddress type name and
the corresponding element value.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="false" name="CtlBypassRouteTable"
type="xs:boolean">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>In the "RequestMetadata" element
specifies if it is requested to enable the optional
bypassing of the route table or not. In the
"MeasurementMetadata" element, specifies if the optional
bypassing of the route table was enabled or not.If
enabled, the normal routing tables will be bypassed and
the probes will be sent directly to a host on an attached
network. If the host is not on a directly-attached
network, an error is returned. This option can be used to
perform the traceroute measurement to a local host
through an interface that has no route defined. This
object can be used when the setsockopt SOL_SOCKET
SO_DONTROUTE option is supported and set (see the POSIX
standard IEEE.1003-1G.1997).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="0" name="CtlProbeDataSize">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the size of the probes of a
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
traceroute measurement in octets (requested if in the
"RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element). If UDP datagrams are used
as probes, then the value contained in this object is
exact. If another protocol is used to transmit probes
(i.e. TCP or ICMP) for which the specified size is not
appropriate, then the implementation can use whatever
size (appropriate to the method) is closest to the
specified size. The maximum value for this object was
computed by subtracting the smallest possible IP header
size of 20 octets (IPv4 header with no options) and the
UDP header size of 8 octets from the maximum IP packet
size. An IP packet has a maximum size of 65535 octets
(excluding IPv6 Jumbograms).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedShort">
<xs:maxInclusive value="65507"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="3" name="CtlTimeOut">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the time-out value, in
seconds, for each probe of a traceroute measurement
(requested if in the "RequestMetadata" element, actually
used if in the "MeasurementMetadata"
element).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedByte">
<xs:minInclusive value="1"/>
<xs:maxInclusive value="60"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="3" name="CtlProbesPerHop">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the number of probes with the
same time-to-live (TTL) value that are sent for each host
(requested if in the "RequestMetadata" element, actually
used if in the "MeasurementMetadata"
element).</xs:documentation>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
</xs:annotation>
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedByte">
<xs:minInclusive value="1"/>
<xs:maxInclusive value="10"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="33434" name="CtlPort">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the base port used by the
traceroute measurement (requested if in the
"RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:unsignedShort">
<xs:minInclusive value="1"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="30" name="CtlMaxTtl" type="tr:u8nonzero">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the maximum TTL value for the
traceroute measurement (requested if in the
"RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="0" name="CtlDSField"
type="xs:unsignedByte">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the value that was requested
to be stored in the Differentiated Services (DS) field in
the traceroute probe (if in the "RequestMetadata"
element). Specifies the value that was stored in the
Differentiated Services (DS) field in the traceroute
probe (if in the "MeasurementMetadata" element). The DS
Field is defined as the Type of Service (TOS) octet in a
IPv4 header or as the Traffic Class octet in a IPv6
header (see section 7 of [RFC2460]). The value of this
object must be a decimal integer in the range from 0 to
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
255. This option can be used to determine what effect an
explicit DS field setting has on a traceroute measurement
and its probes. Not all values are legal or meaningful.
Useful TOS octet values are probably '16' (low delay) and
'8' (high throughput). Further references can be found in
[RFC2474] for the definition of the Differentiated
Services (DS) field and to [RFC1812] Section 5.3.2 for
Type of Service (TOS).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="CtlSourceAddress"
type="tr:inetAddressWithoutDns">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the IP address (which has to
be given as an IP number, not a hostname) as the source
address in traceroute probes (requested if in the
"RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element). On hosts with more than
one IP address, this option can be used in
"RequestMetadata" element to force the source address to
be something other than the primary IP address of the
interface the probe is sent on; the value "unknown" means
the default address will be used. The address type can be
determined by examining the inetAddress type name and the
corresponding element value.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="0" name="CtlIfIndex"
type="xs:unsignedInt">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the interface index as
defined in [RFC2863] that is requested to be used in the
traceroute measurement for sending the traceroute probes
(if in the "RequestMetadata" element). A value of 0 in
the "RequestMetadata" indicates that no specific
interface is requested. Specifies the one actually used
if in the "MeasurementMetadata"
element.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" name="CtlMiscOptions"
type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies implementation dependent
options (requested if in the "RequestMetadata" element,
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
actually used if in the "MeasurementMetadata"
element).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="5" name="CtlMaxFailures"
type="xs:unsignedByte">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the maximum number of
consecutive timeouts allowed before terminating a
traceroute measurement (requested if in the
"RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element). A value of either 255
(maximum hop count/possible TTL value) or a 0 indicates
that the function of terminating a remote traceroute
measurement when a specific number of consecutive
timeouts are detected was disabled. This element is
included to give full compatibility with [RFC4560]. No
known implementation of traceroute currently supports
it.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="false" name="CtlDontFragment"
type="xs:boolean">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies if the don't fragment flag
(DF) in the IP header for a probe was enabled or not (if
in the "MeasurementMetadata" element). If in the
"RequestMetadata", it specifies if the flag was requested
to be enable or not. Setting the DF flag can be used for
performing a manual PATH MTU test.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element default="1" name="CtlInitialTtl"
type="tr:u8nonzero">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the initial TTL value for a
traceroute measurement (requested if in the
"RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element). Such TTL setting is
intended to bypass the initial (often well known) portion
of a path.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element maxOccurs="1" minOccurs="0" name="CtlDescr"
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>The purpose of this element is to
provide a description of the traceroute
measurement.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="CtlType" type="tr:_CtlType">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the implementation method
used for the traceroute measurement (requested if in the
"RequestMetadata" element, actually used if in the
"MeasurementMetadata" element). It specifies if the
traceroute is using TCP, UDP, ICMP or other type of
probes. It is possible to specify other types of probes
by using an element specified in another schema with a
different namespace.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="_Measurement">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Contains the actual traceroute measurement
results.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="TestName" type="tr:string255">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the name of a traceroute
measurement. This is not necessarily unique, within any
well-defined scope (e.g. a specific host, initiator of
the traceroute measurement).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="ResultsStartDateAndTime" type="xs:dateTime">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the date and start time of
the traceroute measurement. This is the time when the
first probe was seen at the sending
interface.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<xs:element name="ResultsIpTgtAddr"
type="tr:inetAddressWithoutDns">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the IP address associated
with a CtlTargetAddress value when the destination
address is specified as a DNS name. The value of this
object should be "unknown" if a DNS name is not specified
or when a specified DNS name fails to resolve. The
address type can be determined by examining the inetAddress
type name and the corresponding element
value.</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="ProbeResults" type="tr:_ProbeResults"/>
<xs:element name="ResultsEndDateAndTime" type="xs:dateTime">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>Specifies the date and end time of the
traceroute measurement. It is either the time when the
response to the last probe of the traceroute measurement
was received or the time when the last probe of the
traceroute measurement was sent plus the relative timeout
(in case of missing response).</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:element>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name="traceRoute">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" name="RequestMetadata"
type="tr:_Metadata"/>
<xs:element maxOccurs="4294967295" minOccurs="0"
name="Measurement">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element minOccurs="0" name="MeasurementMetadata"
type="tr:_Metadata"/>
<xs:element maxOccurs="4294967295" minOccurs="0"
name="MeasurementResult"
type="tr:_Measurement"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
8. Security Considerations
Security considerations discussed in this section are grouped into
considerations related to conducting traceroute measurements and
considerations related to storing and transmitting traceroute
measurements information.
This memo does not specify an implementation of a traceroute tool.
Neither does it specify a certain procedure for storing traceroute
measurements information. Still it is considered desirable to
discuss related security issues below.
8.1. Conducting Traceroute Measurements
Conducting Internet measurements can raise both security and privacy
concerns. Traceroute measurements, in which traffic is injected into
the network, can be abused for denial-of-service attacks disguised as
legitimate measurement activity.
Measurement parameters MUST be carefully selected so that the
measurements inject trivial amounts of additional traffic into the
networks they measure. If they inject "too much" traffic, they can
skew the results of the measurement, and in extreme cases cause
congestion and denial of service.
The measurements themselves could be harmed by routers giving
measurement traffic a different priority than "normal" traffic, or by
an attacker injecting artificial measurement traffic. If routers can
recognize measurement traffic and treat it separately, the
measurements will not reflect actual user traffic. If an attacker
injects artificial traffic that is accepted as legitimate, the loss
rate will be artificially lowered. Therefore, the measurement
methodologies SHOULD include appropriate techniques to reduce the
probability measurement traffic can be distinguished from "normal"
traffic.
Authentication techniques, such as digital signatures, may be used
where appropriate to guard against injected traffic attacks.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
8.2. Securing Traceroute Measurements Information
Traceroute measurement information are not considered highly
sensitive. Still, they may contain sensitive information on network
paths, routing states, used IP addresses, and roundtrip times, that
operators of networks may want to protect for business or security
reasons.
It is thus important to control access to Information acquired by
conducting traceroute measurements, particularly when transmitting it
over a networks but also when storing it. It is RECOMMENDED that
transmission of traceroute measurement information over a network
uses appropriate protection mechanisms for preserving privacy,
integrity and authenticity. It is further RECOMMENDED that secure
authentication and authorization are used for protecting stored
traceroute measurement information.
9. IANA Considerations
This document uses URNs to describe an XML namespace and an XML
schema for traceroute measurements information storing and
transmission conforming to a registry mechanism described in
[RFC3688]. Two URI assignments are requested.
1. Registration request for the IPPM traceroute measurements
namespace
* URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:traceroute-1.0
* Registrant Contact: IESG
* XML: None. Namespace URIs do not represent an XML
2. Registration request for the IPPM traceroute measurements schema
* URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:traceroute-1.0
* Registrant Contact: IESG
* XML: See the section Section 7 of this document.
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
(IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.
[RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group
MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
[RFC3032] Rosen, E., Tappan, D., Fedorkow, G., Rekhter, Y.,
Farinacci, D., Li, T., and A. Conta, "MPLS Label Stack
Encoding", RFC 3032, January 2001.
[RFC3339] Klyne, G., Ed. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the
Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, July 2002.
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003.
[RFC4001] Daniele, M., Haberman, B., Routhier, S., and J.
Schoenwaelder, "Textual Conventions for Internet Network
Addresses", RFC 4001, February 2005.
[RFC4560] Quittek, J. and K. White, "Definitions of Managed Objects
for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations",
RFC 4560, June 2006.
[RFC5198] Klensin, J. and M. Padlipsky, "Unicode Format for Network
Interchange", RFC 5198, March 2008.
10.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-ipfix-architecture]
Sadasivan, G., "Architecture for IP Flow Information
Export", draft-ietf-ipfix-architecture-12 (work in
progress), September 2006.
[IEEE.1003-1G.1997]
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
"Protocol Independent Interfaces", IEEE Standard 1003.1G,
March 1997.
[RFC1812] Baker, F., "Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers",
RFC 1812, June 1995.
[RFC2474] Nichols, K., Blake, S., Baker, F., and D. Black,
"Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS
Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers", RFC 2474,
December 1998.
[RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information
Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
[RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
[RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder,
"Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580,
April 1999.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
January 2004.
[RFC5101] Claise, B., "Specification of the IP Flow Information
Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of IP Traffic
Flow Information", RFC 5101, January 2008.
[RFC5102] Quittek, J., Bryant, S., Claise, B., Aitken, P., and J.
Meyer, "Information Model for IP Flow Information Export",
RFC 5102, January 2008.
[W3C.REC-xml-20060816]
Paoli, J., Yergeau, F., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Bray, T.,
and E. Maler, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
(Fourth Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium
Recommendation REC-xml-20060816, August 2006,
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816>.
[W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028]
Biron, P. and A. Malhotra, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium
Recommendation REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004,
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028>.
Appendix A. Traceroute Default Configuration Parameters
This section lists traceroute measurement configuration parameters as
well as their defaults on various platforms and illustrates how
widely they may vary. This document considered four major traceroute
tool implementations and compared them based on configurable
parameters and default values. The LINUX (SUSE 9.1), BSD (FreeBSD
7.0) and UNIX (SunOS 5.9) implementations are based on UDP datagrams,
while the WINDOWS (XP SP2) one uses ICMP Echoes. The comparison is
summarized in the following table, where an N/A in the option column,
means that such parameter is not configurable for the specific
implementation. A comprehensive comparison of available
implementations is outside the scope of this document; however,
already by sampling a few different implementations, it can be
observed that they can differ quite significantly in terms of
configurable parameters and also default values. Note that in the
following table only those options which are available in at least
two of the considered implementations are reported.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| OS |Option| Description | Default |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -m |Specify the maximum TTL used | 30 |
|--------+------|in traceroute probes. |---------|
| FreeBSD| -m | | OS var |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -m | | 30 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| -h | | 30 |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -n |Display hop addresses | - |
|--------+------|numerically rather than |---------|
| FreeBSD| -n |symbolically. | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -n | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| -d | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -w |Set the time to wait for a | 3 sec |
|--------+------|response to a probe. |---------|
| FreeBSD| -w | | 5 sec |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -w | | 5 sec |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| -w | | 4 sec |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | N/A |Specify a loose source route | - |
|--------+------|gateway (to direct the |---------|
| FreeBSD| -g |traceroute probes through | - |
|--------+------|routers not necessarily in |---------|
| UNIX | -g | the path). | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| -g | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -p |Set the base UDP port number | 33434 |
|------- +------|used in traceroute probes |---------|
| FreeBSD| -p |(UDP port = base + nhops - 1). | 33434 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -p | | 33434 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -q |Set the number of probes per | 3 |
|--------+------|TTL. |---------|
| FreeBSD| -q | | 3 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -q | | 3 |
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | 3 |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -S |Set the IP source address in |IP |
|--------+------|outgoing probes to the |address |
| FreeBSD| -s |specified value. |of the |
|--------+------| |out |
| UNIX | -s | |interface|
|--------+------| | |
| WINDOWS| N/A | | |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -t |Set the type-of-service (TOS) | 0 |
|--------+------|in the probes to the specified |---------|
| FreeBSD| -t |value. | 0 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -t | | 0 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | 0 |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -v |Verbose output: received ICMP | - |
|--------+------|packets other than |---------|
| FreeBSD| -v |TIME_EXCEEDED and | - |
|--------+------|UNREACHABLE are listed. |---------|
| UNIX | -v | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | N/A |Set the time (in msec) to | - |
|--------+------|pause between probes. |---------|
| FreeBSD| -z | | 0 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -P | | 0 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -r |Bypass the normal routing | - |
|--------+------|tables and send directly to a |---------|
| FreeBSD| -r |host on attached network. | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -r | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -f |Set the initial TTL for the | 1 |
|--------+------|first probe. |---------|
| FreeBSD| -f | | 1 |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -f | | 1 |
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | 1 |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -F |Set the "don't fragment" bit. | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| FreeBSD| -F | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -F | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | N/A |Enables socket level debugging.| - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| FreeBSD| -d | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -d | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | N/A |Use ICMP ECHO instead of UDP | - |
|--------+------|datagrams. |---------|
| FreeBSD| -I | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -I | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | -I |Specify a network interface to | - |
|--------+------|obtain the IP address for |---------|
| FreeBSD| -i |outgoing IP packets | - |
|--------+------|(alternative to option -s). |---------|
| UNIX | -i | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | N/A |Toggle checksum. | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| FreeBSD| -x | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| UNIX | -x | | - |
|--------+------| |---------|
| WINDOWS| N/A | | - |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
| LINUX | - |As optional last parameter, |Depends |
|--------+------|LINUX, FreeBSD and UNIX |on |
| FreeBSD| - |implementations allow |implement|
|--------+------|specifying the probe datagram |ation. |
| UNIX | - |length for outgoing probes. | |
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
|--------+------| | |
| WINDOWS| N/A | | |
+--------+------+-------------------------------+---------+
A.1. Alternative Traceroute Implementations
As stated above, the widespread use of firewalls might prevent UDP or
ICMP based traceroutes to completely trace the path to a destination,
since traceroute probes might end up being filtered. In some cases,
such limitation might be overcome by sending instead TCP packets to
specific ports that hosts located behind the firewall are listening
for connections on. TCP based implementations use TCP SYN or FIN
probes and listen for TIME_EXCEEDED messages, TCP RESET and other
messages from firewalls and gateways on the path. On the other hand,
some firewalls filter out TCP SYN packets to prevent denial of
service attacks, therefore the actual advantage of using TCP instead
of UDP traceroute depends mainly on firewall configurations, which
are not known in advance. A detailed analysis of TCP-based
traceroute tools and measurements was outside the scope of this
document, anyway for completeness reasons the information model
supports the storing of TCP-based traceroute measurements, too.
Appendix B. Known Problems with Traceroute
B.1. Compatibility between traceroute measurements results and IPPM
metrics
Because of implementation choices, a known inconsistency exists
between the round-trip delay metric defined by the IPPM working group
in RFC 2681 and the results returned by the current traceroute tool
implementations. Unfortunately, it is unlikely that the traceroute
tool implementations will implement the standard definition in the
near future. The only possibility is therefore to compare results of
different traceroute measurements one with each other; in order to do
this, specifications both of the operating system (name and version)
and of the traceroute tool version used were added to the metadata
elements in order to help in comparing metrics between two different
traceroute measurements results (if run using the same operating
system and the same version of the tool). Moreover, the traceroute
tool has built-in configurable mechanisms like time-outs and can
experience problems related to the crossing of firewalls; therefore
some of the packets that traceroute sends out end up being time-out
or filtered. As a consequence, it might not be possible to trace the
path to a node or there might not be a complete set of probes
describing the RTT to reach it.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
Appendix C. Differences to DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB
For performing remote traceroute operations at managed node, the IETF
has standardized the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB module in [RFC4560]. This
module allows:
o retrieving capability information of the traceroute tool
implementation at the managed node,
o configuring traceroute measurements to be performed,
o retrieving information about ongoing and completed traceroute
measurements,
o retrieving traceroute measurement statistics.
The traceroute storage format described in this document has
significant overlaps with this MIB module. Particularly, the models
for the traceroute measurement configuration and for the result from
completed measurements are almost identical. But for other pats of
the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE MIB module there is no need to model them in a
traceroute measurements storage format. Particularly, the capability
information, information about ongoing measurements and measurement
statistics are not covered by the DISMAN traceroute storage model.
Concerning traceroute measurements and their results, there are
structural differences between the two models caused by the different
choices for the encoding of the specification. For DISMAN-
TRACEROUTE-MIB, the Structure of Management Information (SMIv2, STD
58, RFC 2578 [RFC2578]) was used, while the IPPM traceroute
measurements data model is encoded using XML.
This difference in structure implies that the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB
module contains SMI-specific information element (managed objects)
that concern tables of managed objects (specification, entry creation
and deletion, status retrieval) that are not required for the XML-
encoded traceroute measurements data model.
But for most of the remaining information elements that concern
configuration of traceroute measurements and results of completed
measurements, the semantics is identical between the DISMAN-
TRACEROUTE-MIB module and the traceroute measurements data model.
There are very few exceptions to this which are listed below. Also
naming of information elements is identical between both models with
a few exceptions. For the traceroute measurements data model, a few
information elements have been added, some because of the different
structure and some to provide additional information on completed
measurements.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
C.1. Scope
There are some basic differences in nature and application between
MIB modules and XML documents. This results in two major differences
of Scope between the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB module and the traceroute
measurements data model.
The first difference is the traceRouteResultsTable contained in the
DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB module. This table allows online observation
of status and progress of an ongoing traceroute measurement. This
highly dynamic information is not included in the traceroute
measurements data model, because it has not been envisioned to use
the model for dynamically reporting progress of individual traceroute
measurements. The traceroute measurements data model is rather
intended to be used for reporting completed traceroute measurements.
The second difference is due to the fact that information in a MIB is
typically tied to a local node hosting the MIB instance. The
"RequestMetadata" element specified in the traceroute measurements
data model can be used for specifying a measurement request that may
be applied to several probes in a network. This concept does not
exist in the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB module.
For the remaining elements in the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB module and in
the traceroute measurements data model there is a very good match
between the two worlds. The traceRouteCtlTable corresponds to the
"MeasurementMetadata" element and the combination of the
traceRouteProbeHistoryTable and the traceRouteHopsTable corresponds
to a collection of "MeasurementResult" elements.
C.2. Naming
Basically, names in both models are chosen using the same naming
conventions.
For the traceroute measurement configuration information all names,
such as CtlProbesPerHop, are identical in both models except for the
traceRoute prefix that was removed to avoid unnecessary redundancy in
the XML file and for CtlDataSize which was renamed to
CtlProbeDataSize for clarification in the traceroute measurements
data model.
Results of measurements in the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB modules are
distributed over two tables, the traceRouteResultsTable containing
mainly information about ongoing measurements and the
traceRouteProbeHistoryTable containing only information about
completed measurements. According to the SMIv2 naming conventions
names of information elements in these tables have different prefixes
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
(traceRouteResults and traceRouteProbeHistory). Since the traceroute
measurements data model only reports on completed measurements, this
separation is not needed anymore and the prefix "Results" is used for
all related information elements.
Beyond that, there are only a few changes in element names. The
renaming actions include:
o traceRouteProbeHistoryResponse to ProbeRoundTripTime,
o traceRouteProbeHistoryHAddr to HopAddr,
o traceRouteProbeHistoryTime to ResultsEndDateAndTime,
o traceRouteProbeHistoryLastRC to ResultsHopRawOutputData.
C.3. Semantics
The semantics was changed for two information elements only.
For traceRouteProbeHistoryResponse in the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB, a
value of 0 indicated, that it was not possible to transmit a probe.
For the traceroute measurements data model, a value of 0 for element
RoundTripTime indicates that the measured time was less than one
millisecond, while for the case that it was not possible to transmit
a probe a string is used that indicates the problem.
For traceRouteCtlIfIndex in the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB, a value of 0
indicated, that it the option to set the index is not available.
This was translated to the traceroute measurements data model, such
that a value of 0 for this element indicates that the used interface
is unknown.
The element traceRouteProbeHistoryLastRC in the DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB
was replaced by element ResultsHopRawOutputData. While
traceRouteProbeHistoryLastRC just reports a reply code,
ResultsHopRawOutputData reports the full raw output data (per hop)
produced by the traceroute measurements that was used.
C.4. Additional Information Elements
Only a few information elements have been added to the model of the
DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB module.
o For providing information on the MPLS label stack entries of a
probe in the traceroute measurement path MPLSLabelStackEntry was
added.
o For providing additional timestamp beyond ResultsEndDateAndTime,
ResultsStartDateAndTime and Time were added.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
o For providing DNS names at the time of the execution of the
traceroute for each HopAddr (which may change over time) HopName
was added.
Appendix D. Traceroute Examples with XML representation
This Section shows some examples of traceroute applications. In
addition the encoding of requests and results is shown for some of
those examples. Note that also in these XML examples some lines
appear wrapped due to the limited length of line.
A typical traceroute on a linux system looks like the following:
# traceroute -f 4 www.example 1500
traceroute to ww.example (192.0.2.42), 30 hops max, 1500 byte packets
5 out.host1.example (192.0.2.254) 6.066 ms 5.625 ms 6.095 ms
6 rtr4.host6.example (192.0.2.142) 6.979 ms 6.221 ms 7.368 ms
7 hop7.rtr9.example (192.0.2.11) 16.165 ms 15.347 ms 15.514 ms
8 192.0.2.222 (192.0.2.222) 32.796 ms 28.723 ms 26.988 ms
9 in.example (192.0.2.123) 15.861 ms 16.262 ms 17.610 ms
10 in.example (192.0.2.123)(N!) 17.391 ms * *
This traceroute ignores the first 4 hops and uses 1500 byte packets.
It does not reach its goal since the last listed hop says that the
network is not reachable (N!). The XML representation for this trace
follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<traceRoute xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:traceroute-1.0">
<RequestMetadata>
<TestName>Example 1</TestName>
<OSName/>
<OSVersion/>
<ToolVersion/>
<ToolName/>
<CtlTargetAddress>
<inetAddressDns>www.example</inetAddressDns>
</CtlTargetAddress>
<CtlBypassRouteTable/>
<CtlProbeDataSize>1500</CtlProbeDataSize>
<CtlTimeOut/>
<CtlProbesPerHop/>
<CtlPort/>
<CtlMaxTtl/>
<CtlDSField/>
<CtlSourceAddress>
<inetAddressUnknown/>
</CtlSourceAddress>
<CtlIfIndex/>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<CtlMiscOptions/>
<CtlMaxFailures/>
<CtlDontFragment/>
<CtlInitialTtl>4</CtlInitialTtl>
<CtlDescr>Show how it encodes in XML</CtlDescr>
<CtlType><UDP/></CtlType>
</RequestMetadata>
<Measurement>
<MeasurementMetadata>
<TestName>Example 1</TestName>
<OSName>Linux</OSName>
<OSVersion>2.6.16.54-0.2.5-smp i386</OSVersion>
<ToolVersion>1.0</ToolVersion>
<ToolName>traceroute</ToolName>
<CtlTargetAddress>
<inetAddressDns>www.example</inetAddressDns>
</CtlTargetAddress>
<CtlBypassRouteTable/>
<CtlProbeDataSize>1500</CtlProbeDataSize>
<CtlTimeOut/>
<CtlProbesPerHop/>
<CtlPort/>
<CtlMaxTtl/>
<CtlDSField/>
<CtlSourceAddress>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.1</inetAddressIpv4>
</CtlSourceAddress>
<CtlIfIndex>2</CtlIfIndex>
<CtlMiscOptions/>
<CtlMaxFailures/>
<CtlDontFragment/>
<CtlInitialTtl>4</CtlInitialTtl>
<CtlDescr>Show how it encodes in XML</CtlDescr>
<CtlType><UDP/></CtlType>
</MeasurementMetadata>
<MeasurementResult>
<TestName>Example 1</TestName>
<ResultsStartDateAndTime>2008-05-16T14:22:34+02:00</ResultsStar
tDateAndTime>
<ResultsIpTgtAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.42</inetAddressIpv4>
</ResultsIpTgtAddr>
<ProbeResults>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.254</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<HopName>out.host1.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>6</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:35+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.254</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>out.host1.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime><roundTripTime>5</roundTripTime></Pro
beRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:35+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.254</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>out.host1.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>6</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:35+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<HopRawOutputData> 5 out.host1.example (192.0.2.254) 6.06
6 ms 5.625 ms 6.095 ms</HopRawOutputData>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.142</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>rtr4.host6.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>6</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:36+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.142</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>rtr4.host6.example</HopName>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>6</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:36+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.142</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>rtr4.host6.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>7</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:37+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<HopRawOutputData> 6 rtr4.host6.example (192.0.2.142) 6.9
79 ms 6.221 ms 7.368 ms</HopRawOutputData>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.11</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop7.rtr9.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>16</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:37+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.11</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop7.rtr9.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>15</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:38+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.11</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop7.rtr9.example</HopName>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>15</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:38+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<HopRawOutputData> 7 hop7.rtr9.example (192.0.2.11) 16.16
5 ms 15.347 ms 15.514 ms</HopRawOutputData>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.222</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>32</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:39+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.222</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>38</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:39+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.222</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>26</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:39+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<HopRawOutputData> 8 192.0.2.222 (192.0.2.222) 32.796 ms
28.723 ms 26.988 ms</HopRawOutputData>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<HopName>in.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>15</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:40+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>in.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>16</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:40+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>in.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>17</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:40+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<HopRawOutputData> 9 in.example (192.0.2.123) 15.861 ms
16.262 ms 17.610 ms</HopRawOutputData>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>in.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>17</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>noRouteToTarget</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:41+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<HopName>in.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTimeNotAvailable/>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>requestTimedOut</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:44+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>in.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTimeNotAvailable/>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>requestTimedOut</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-16T14:22:44+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<HopRawOutputData>10 in.example (192.0.2.123)(N!) 17.391
ms * *</HopRawOutputData>
</hop>
</ProbeResults>
<ResultsEndDateAndTime>2008-05-16T14:22:44+02:00</ResultsEndDat
eAndTime>
</MeasurementResult>
</Measurement>
</traceRoute>
The second example was generated on an OpenBSD system. On that
system the traceroute looks the following:
# traceroute -P tcp w2.example 128
traceroute to w2.example (192.0.2.254), 64 hops max, 160 byte packets
1 router1.example.org (192.0.2.22) 0.486 ms 0.486 ms 0.482 ms
2 router7.example.org (192.0.2.1) 3.27 ms 1.420 ms 1.873 ms
3 hop0.c.example (192.0.2.105) 3.177 ms 3.258 ms 3.859 ms
4 hop6.c.example (192.0.2.107) 5.994 ms 4.607 ms 5.678 ms
5 hop3.c.example (192.0.2.111) 20.341 ms 20.732 ms 19.505 ms
6 in.example.net (192.0.2.222) 20.333 ms 19.174 ms 19.856 ms
7 egress.example.net (192.0.2.227) 20.268 ms 21.79 ms 19.992 ms
8 routerin.example (192.0.2.253) 19.983 ms 19.931 ms 19.894 ms
9 routerdmz.example (192.0.2.249) 20.943 ms !X * 19.829 ms !X
It was executed with the TCP protocol and 128 byte packets (plus
header). The traceroute ended at hop 9 because the packets are
administratively filtered (!X). A corresponding XML representation
follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<traceRoute xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:traceroute-1.0">
<RequestMetadata>
<TestName>Example 2</TestName>
<OSName/>
<OSVersion/>
<ToolVersion/>
<ToolName/>
<CtlTargetAddress>
<inetAddressDns>w2.example</inetAddressDns>
</CtlTargetAddress>
<CtlBypassRouteTable/>
<CtlProbeDataSize>128</CtlProbeDataSize>
<CtlTimeOut/>
<CtlProbesPerHop/>
<CtlPort/>
<CtlMaxTtl/>
<CtlDSField/>
<CtlSourceAddress>
<inetAddressUnknown/>
</CtlSourceAddress>
<CtlIfIndex/>
<CtlMiscOptions/>
<CtlMaxFailures/>
<CtlDontFragment/>
<CtlInitialTtl/>
<CtlDescr>Show how it encodes in XML</CtlDescr>
<CtlType><TCP/></CtlType>
</RequestMetadata>
<Measurement>
<MeasurementMetadata>
<TestName>Example 2</TestName>
<OSName>OpenBSD</OSName>
<OSVersion>4.1 i386</OSVersion>
<ToolVersion></ToolVersion>
<ToolName>traceroute</ToolName>
<CtlTargetAddress>
<inetAddressDns>w2.example</inetAddressDns>
</CtlTargetAddress>
<CtlBypassRouteTable/>
<CtlProbeDataSize>128</CtlProbeDataSize>
<CtlTimeOut/>
<CtlProbesPerHop/>
<CtlPort/>
<CtlMaxTtl/>
<CtlDSField/>
<CtlSourceAddress>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.42</inetAddressIpv4>
</CtlSourceAddress>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 53]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<CtlIfIndex>1</CtlIfIndex>
<CtlMiscOptions/>
<CtlMaxFailures/>
<CtlDontFragment/>
<CtlInitialTtl/>
<CtlDescr>Show how it encodes in XML</CtlDescr>
<CtlType><TCP/></CtlType>
</MeasurementMetadata>
<MeasurementResult>
<TestName>Example 2</TestName>
<ResultsStartDateAndTime>2008-05-14T09:57:11+02:00</ResultsStar
tDateAndTime>
<ResultsIpTgtAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.254</inetAddressIpv4>
</ResultsIpTgtAddr>
<ProbeResults>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.22</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>router1.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:13+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.22</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>router1.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:13+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.22</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>router1.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 54]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:13+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.1</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>router7.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>3</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:13+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.1</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>router7.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>1</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:13+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.1</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>router7.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>1</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:14+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.105</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop0.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>3</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 55]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:14+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.105</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop0.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>3</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:14+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.105</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop0.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>3</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:14+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.107</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop6.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>5</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:15+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.107</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop6.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>4</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:16+02:00</Time>
</probe>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 56]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.107</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop6.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>5</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:16+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.111</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop3.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>20</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:17+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.111</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop3.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>20</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:18+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.111</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop3.c.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>19</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:19+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 57]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.222</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>in.example.net</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>20</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:20+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.222</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>in.example.net</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>19</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:20+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.222</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>in.example.net</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>19</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:21+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.227</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>egress.example.net</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>20</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:22+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 58]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.227</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>egress.example.net</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>21</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:22+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.227</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>egress.example.net</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>19</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:23+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.253</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>routerin.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>19</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:24+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.253</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>routerin.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>19</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:24+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.253</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 59]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<HopName>routerin.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>19</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:25+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.249</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>routerdmz.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>20</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>unknown</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:26+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.249</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>routerdmz.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTimeNotAvailable/>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>requestTimedOut</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:26+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.249</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>routerdmz.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>19</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>unknown</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T09:57:30+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
</ProbeResults>
<ResultsEndDateAndTime>2008-05-14T09:57:30+02:00</ResultsEndDat
eAndTime>
</MeasurementResult>
</Measurement>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 60]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
</traceRoute>
The third and last example is based on the Microsoft Windows pendant
of traceroute. On a MS Windows system the command is called
"tracert" and typically looks as follows:
# tracert -h 10 www.example.org
Tracing route to www.example.org [192.0.2.11]
over a maximum of 10 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 8 ms 192.0.2.99
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms r1.provider4.example [192.0.2.102]
3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms rtr8.provider8.example [192.0.2.254]
4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms hop11.hoster7.example [192.0.2.4]
5 2 ms 3 ms 1 ms sw6.provider2.example [192.0.2.201]
6 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms out.provider2.example [192.0.2.111]
7 * 6 ms 5 ms 192.0.2.123
8 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms 192.0.2.42
9 94 ms 95 ms 95 ms ingress.example.org [192.0.2.199]
10 168 ms 169 ms 169 ms 192.0.2.44
Trace complete.
In this example the trace was limited to 10 hops. So, the tenth and
last hop of this example was not the final destination. Applying the
XML schema defined in this document the trace could look as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<traceRoute xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:traceroute-1.0">
<RequestMetadata>
<TestName>Example 3</TestName>
<OSName/>
<OSVersion/>
<ToolVersion/>
<ToolName/>
<CtlTargetAddress>
<inetAddressDns>www.example.org</inetAddressDns>
</CtlTargetAddress>
<CtlBypassRouteTable/>
<CtlProbeDataSize/>
<CtlTimeOut/>
<CtlProbesPerHop/>
<CtlPort/>
<CtlMaxTtl>10</CtlMaxTtl>
<CtlDSField/>
<CtlSourceAddress>
<inetAddressUnknown/>
</CtlSourceAddress>
<CtlIfIndex/>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 61]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<CtlMiscOptions/>
<CtlMaxFailures/>
<CtlDontFragment/>
<CtlInitialTtl/>
<CtlDescr>Show how it encodes in XML</CtlDescr>
<CtlType><TCP/></CtlType>
</RequestMetadata>
<Measurement>
<MeasurementMetadata>
<TestName>Example 3</TestName>
<OSName>Windows</OSName>
<OSVersion>XP SP2 32-bit</OSVersion>
<ToolVersion></ToolVersion>
<ToolName>tracert</ToolName>
<CtlTargetAddress>
<inetAddressDns>www.example.org</inetAddressDns>
</CtlTargetAddress>
<CtlBypassRouteTable/>
<CtlProbeDataSize/>
<CtlTimeOut/>
<CtlProbesPerHop/>
<CtlPort/>
<CtlMaxTtl>10</CtlMaxTtl>
<CtlDSField/>
<CtlSourceAddress>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.142</inetAddressIpv4>
</CtlSourceAddress>
<CtlIfIndex>3</CtlIfIndex>
<CtlMiscOptions/>
<CtlMaxFailures/>
<CtlDontFragment/>
<CtlInitialTtl/>
<CtlDescr>Show how it encodes in XML</CtlDescr>
<CtlType><TCP/></CtlType>
</MeasurementMetadata>
<MeasurementResult>
<TestName>Example 3</TestName>
<ResultsStartDateAndTime>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</ResultsStar
tDateAndTime>
<ResultsIpTgtAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.11</inetAddressIpv4>
</ResultsIpTgtAddr>
<ProbeResults>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.99</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 62]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>1</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.99</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>1</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.99</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>8</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.102</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>r1.provider4.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.102</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>r1.provider4.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 63]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.102</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>r1.provider4.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.254</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>rtr8.provider8.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.254</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>rtr8.provider8.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.254</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>rtr8.provider8.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>0</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 64]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.4</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop11.hoster7.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>1</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:09+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.4</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop11.hoster7.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>1</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:10+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.4</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>hop11.hoster7.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>1</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:10+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.201</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>sw6.provider2.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>2</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:10+02:00</Time>
</probe>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 65]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.201</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>sw6.provider2.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>3</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:11+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.201</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>sw6.provider2.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>1</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:11+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.111</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>out.provider2.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>3</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:11+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.111</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>out.provider2.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>3</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:11+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 66]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.111</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>out.provider2.example</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>3</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:12+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTimeNotAvailable/>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>requestTimedOut</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:14+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>6</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:15+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.123</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>5</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:16+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.42</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 67]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
<roundTripTime>5</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:17+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.42</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>5</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:17+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.42</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>5</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:17+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.199</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>ingress.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>94</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:19+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.199</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>ingress.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>95</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:19+02:00</Time>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 68]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.199</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<HopName>ingress.example.org</HopName>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>95</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:19+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
<hop>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.44</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>168</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:20+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.44</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>169</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:21+02:00</Time>
</probe>
<probe>
<HopAddr>
<inetAddressIpv4>192.0.2.44</inetAddressIpv4>
</HopAddr>
<ProbeRoundTripTime>
<roundTripTime>169</roundTripTime>
</ProbeRoundTripTime>
<ResponseStatus>responseReceived</ResponseStatus>
<Time>2008-05-14T11:03:23+02:00</Time>
</probe>
</hop>
</ProbeResults>
<ResultsEndDateAndTime>2008-05-14T11:03:23+02:00</ResultsEndDat
eAndTime>
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 69]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
</MeasurementResult>
</Measurement>
</traceRoute>
The three examples given in this section are intended to give an
impression on how a trace could be represented in XML. The
representation generated by an implementation may differ from the
examples here dependent on the system and the capabilities of the
traceroute implementation.
Authors' Addresses
Saverio Niccolini
NEC Laboratories Europe, NEC Europe Ltd.
Kurfuersten-Anlage 36
Heidelberg 69115
Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 6221 4342 118
Email: saverio.niccolini@nw.neclab.eu
URI: http://www.nw.neclab.eu
Sandra Tartarelli
NEC Laboratories Europe, NEC Europe Ltd.
Kurfuersten-Anlage 36
Heidelberg 69115
Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 6221 4342 132
Email: sandra.tartarelli@nw.neclab.eu
URI: http://www.nw.neclab.eu
Juergen Quittek
NEC Laboratories Europe, NEC Europe Ltd.
Kurfuersten-Anlage 36
Heidelberg 69115
Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 6221 4342 115
Email: quittek@nw.neclab.eu
URI: http://www.nw.neclab.eu
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 70]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
Thomas Dietz
NEC Laboratories Europe, NEC Europe Ltd.
Kurfuersten-Anlage 36
Heidelberg 69115
Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 6221 4342 128
Email: thomas.dietz@nw.neclab.eu
URI: http://www.nw.neclab.eu
Martin Swany
Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware
Newark DE 19716
U.S.A.
Email: swany@UDel.Edu
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 71]
Internet-Draft Traceroute Storage Format October 2008
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND
THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF
THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Niccolini, et al. Expires April 26, 2009 [Page 72]