Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Spencer Dawkins) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

Comment (2014-03-26 for -04)
No email
send info
Having just struggled with setting up tc and netem for the
first time in years this week, it'd be a fine service to
humanity if you were able to make annotated setup scripts for
your tests available, either as informative references via
some stable URL or even in an appendix. I understand if you
don't want to, but it'd be a nice thing.

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

Barry Leiba No Objection

(Kathleen Moriarty) No Objection

Comment (2014-03-26 for -04)
No email
send info
Just a nit:

In Introduction, change From:
The IETF (IP Performance Metrics working group, IPPM)
To:
The IETF IP Performance Metrics working group (IPPM)

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection