Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track
draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2014-07-21
|
05 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2014-07-03
|
05 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from AUTH48-DONE |
2014-07-01
|
05 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48 |
2014-06-16
|
05 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from RFC-EDITOR |
2014-06-12
|
05 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from AUTH |
2014-06-02
|
05 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to AUTH from EDIT |
2014-04-07
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent |
2014-04-07
|
05 | (System) | RFC Editor state changed to EDIT |
2014-04-07
|
05 | (System) | Announcement was received by RFC Editor |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Warren Kumari. |
2014-04-03
|
05 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
2014-04-03
|
05 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | IESG has approved the document |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | Ballot approval text was generated |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Tero Kivinen | Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response' |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | Ballot writeup was changed |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Al Morton | IANA Review state changed to Version Changed - Review Needed from IANA OK - No Actions Needed |
2014-04-03
|
05 | Al Morton | New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-05.txt |
2014-03-27
|
04 | Cindy Morgan | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation |
2014-03-27
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown |
2014-03-27
|
04 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2014-03-27
|
04 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2014-03-26
|
04 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2014-03-26
|
04 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot comment] Just a nit: In Introduction, change From: The IETF (IP Performance Metrics working group, IPPM) To: The IETF IP Performance Metrics working group … [Ballot comment] Just a nit: In Introduction, change From: The IETF (IP Performance Metrics working group, IPPM) To: The IETF IP Performance Metrics working group (IPPM) |
2014-03-26
|
04 | Kathleen Moriarty | Ballot comment text updated for Kathleen Moriarty |
2014-03-26
|
04 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2014-03-26
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] Having just struggled with setting up tc and netem for the first time in years this week, it'd be a fine service to … [Ballot comment] Having just struggled with setting up tc and netem for the first time in years this week, it'd be a fine service to humanity if you were able to make annotated setup scripts for your tests available, either as informative references via some stable URL or even in an appendix. I understand if you don't want to, but it'd be a nice thing. |
2014-03-26
|
04 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2014-03-26
|
04 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
2014-03-25
|
04 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2014-03-25
|
04 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2014-03-15
|
04 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2014-03-03
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup |
2014-03-03
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-03-27 |
2014-03-03
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Ballot has been issued |
2014-03-03
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2014-03-03
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Created "Approve" ballot |
2014-03-03
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Ballot writeup was changed |
2014-02-27
|
04 | (System) | IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call |
2014-02-20
|
04 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ondřej Surý |
2014-02-20
|
04 | Tero Kivinen | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ondřej Surý |
2014-02-19
|
04 | (System) | IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed |
2014-02-19
|
04 | Amanda Baber | IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require … IESG/Authors/WG Chairs: IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments: We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions. While it is helpful for the IANA Considerations section of the document to remain in place upon publication, if authors prefer to remove it, IANA does not object. If this assessment is not accurate, please respond as soon as possible. |
2014-02-17
|
04 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari |
2014-02-17
|
04 | Gunter Van de Velde | Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Warren Kumari |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Jean Mahoney | Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Amy Vezza | The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Test Plan and Results for … The following Last Call announcement was sent out: From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce CC: Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org Sender: Subject: Last Call: (Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track) to Informational RFC The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm) to consider the following document: - 'Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2680 on the Standards Track' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2014-02-27. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the standards track, specifically RFC 2680 on One-way Loss Metrics. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2680. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Last call was requested |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Last call announcement was generated |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Ballot approval text was generated |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | Ballot writeup was generated |
2014-02-13
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Spencer Dawkins | State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | IESG state changed to Publication Requested |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | 1. Summary The document shepherd is Brian Trammell. The responsible Area Director is Spencer Dawkins. The document defines a plan for testing implementations of RFC … 1. Summary The document shepherd is Brian Trammell. The responsible Area Director is Spencer Dawkins. The document defines a plan for testing implementations of RFC 2680 on one-way packet loss metrics, based upon the requirements set out in RFC 2680 itself, in order to evaluate ambiguity in RFC 2680 that may lead to interoperability problems. It also reports on the results of these tests with two independent implementation, and recommends the revision of RFC 2680 based on ambiguities found herein, with subsequent advancement of RFC 2680bis to Internet Standard. 2. Review and Consensus The document has clear working group consensus for publication, and has been reviewed by several WG participants since its initial adoption as a working group item. 3. Intellectual Property There are no IPR disclosures related to this document, and the shepherd is satisfied there is no undisclosed IPR on this document. 4. Other Points RFC 2680bis already exists as an individual draft waiting for WG adoption; this draft was not adopted during the March 2013 rechartering of the WG, as current work on the RFC 2330 update and the IPPM performance metrics registry design team may impact the content of a future 2680bis. However, this draft has been complete for some time and is ready for publication. |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | State Change Notice email list changed to ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680@tools.ietf.org |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | Responsible AD changed to Spencer Dawkins |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | Working group state set to Submitted to IESG for Publication |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | IESG state set to Publication Requested |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | IESG process started in state Publication Requested |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | Intended Status changed to Informational from None |
2014-01-20
|
04 | Brian Trammell | Changed document writeup |
2014-01-03
|
04 | Brian Trammell | Changed document writeup |
2013-10-19
|
04 | Al Morton | New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-04.txt |
2013-07-08
|
03 | Al Morton | New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-03.txt |
2013-03-14
|
02 | Brian Trammell | Changed shepherd to Brian Trammell |
2013-02-17
|
02 | Al Morton | New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-02.txt |
2013-01-03
|
01 | Cindy Morgan | New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-01.txt |
2012-07-08
|
00 | Al Morton | New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2680-00.txt |