DA: Datamover Architecture for the Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI)
draft-ietf-ips-iwarp-da-05
Yes
(Lars Eggert)
No Objection
(Bill Fenner)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-01-22)
Unknown
draft-ietf-ips-iser-06.txt (from Gen-ART review by Joel Halpern) Nit: After the first occurrence of "RDMA-Capable Protocol" in the abstract, could you just put "(RCaP)" Nit: I would include all the acronyms referenced in the definitions (SN, RCaP, ...) into the Acronym list. Nit: I may have missed it, but I did not find a definitions (or description) of target and initiator before 2.4. I presume that this is well-defined in other RDMA specs. A paragraph here (or actual definitions in section 1) would be helpful. (Yes, this can be understood once one gets to 2.5. It is a matter of avoiding usage before description problems.)
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-01-21)
Unknown
This is an excellent example of a concept that the IESG has been discussing lately: how to separate a framework/architecture document from a protocol specification to avoid normative references to informational docs. This was done well in this instance. I could not find a use of the VERBS reference in the iser doc. I was trying to figure out if that reference was informational, but couldn't find the citation.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2007-01-22)
Unknown
draft-ietf-ips-iwarp-da-05.txt says: 5.5 Transport Connection The term "Transport Connection" is used in this document as a generic term to represent the end-to-end logical connection as defined by the underlying reliable transport protocol. For this revision of this document, a Transport Connection means only a TCP connection. I think the second sentence may be confusing when this reaches RFC status, since those are not versioned. I suggest replacing it with something like: "For this document, all instances of Transport Connection refer to a TCP connection".