ECP Groups For IKE and IKEv2
draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-ecp-groups-03
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Yes
(Brian Carpenter; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
Idnits (use the latest revision from the web) gives a number of complaints: * The document seems to lack an RFC 3979 Section 5, para 1 IPR Disclosure Acknowledgement. RFC 3979 Section 5 paragraph 1 text: "The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79." * The document seems to lack an RFC 3979 Section 5, para 2 IPR Disclosure Acknowledgement. RFC 3979 Section 5 paragraph 2 text: "Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr." * The document seems to lack an RFC 3979 Section 5, para 3 IPR Disclosure Invitation. RFC 3979 Section 5 paragraph 3 text: "The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org." Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt: - It seems as if not all pages are separated by form feeds - found 0 form feeds but 14 pages Miscellaneous warnings: - The copyright year in the RFC 3978 Section 5.4 Copyright Line does not match the current year - The document seems to lack the recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119 keywords. RFC 2119 paragraph 2 text: "The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119." Experimental warnings: - Unused Reference: [RFC-3526] is defined on line 592, but not referenced ' [RFC-3526] T. Kivinen and M. Kojo, More Modular Exponential MODP'
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) No Objection