Number Portability Parameters for the "tel" URI
draft-ietf-iptel-tel-np-11
Yes
(Cullen Jennings)
No Objection
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-04-27)
Unknown
A few minor comments on the ABNF: - The construct *1(foo) is confusing; you could use [foo] instead. - As Magnus notes, 1*phonedigit-hex could be empty since visual-seperator is optional. It's unclear to me why some of the options (rn, npdi, cic) don't include the semicolon and are expressed as *1(foo), but some (rn-context and cic-context) do include the semicolon and are expressed as requred. I think it would be more clear if each of the optional items matched the "parameter" production of the 3966 ABNF.
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-04-26)
Unknown
From Gen-ART review by Ron Bonica: - In Section 5, are you sure that you want to refer to the two database access as "first" and "second"? Would words like "originating network" and "serving network" be more descriptive? (This is a question, not a comment?) - In Section 5.1, you talk about "cic" and "rn" information that is "not useful". A few paragraphs later, you talk about what to do if the "cic" represents the local network or the "rn" represents the local node. I assume that this is what you mean by "not useful". If so, would the word "local" be more descriptive than "not useful"? (Again, just a question).
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-04-21)
Unknown
IANA should update the tel URI pointer in it registry to RFC 3966
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2006-04-26)
Unknown
A brief description of "freephone" as term of art may be useful on its first appearance. The examples are clear enough from the U.S. perspective, but a quick "this is a called-party pays number" intro might help.