Requirements for IPv6 Prefix Delegation
draft-ietf-ipv6-prefix-delegation-requirement-04
Yes
(Margaret Cullen)
(Thomas Narten)
No Objection
(David Kessens)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-02)
Unknown
My original comment was: please explain "secure transmission" in section 3.5. It looks like section 3.5 has been renumbered, and it is now section 3.6. The section now talks about authentication, which is good. I believe that integrity protection is necessary. I am not sure if confidentiality is also needed.
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-01)
Unknown
The security terminology could be a bit clearer, but I'm not going to worry. That said, if the document goes back for any more work, I'll supply some new text.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown