%% You should probably cite rfc9365 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-08, number = {draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-08}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking/08/}, author = {Jaehoon Paul Jeong}, title = {{IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases}}, pagetotal = 38, year = , month = , day = , abstract = {This document discusses the problem statement and use cases of IP- based vehicular networking for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The main scenarios of vehicular communications are vehicle- to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), and vehicle-to- everything (V2X) communications. First, this document surveys use cases using V2V, V2I, and V2X networking. Second, it analyzes proposed protocols for IP-based vehicular networking and highlights the limitations and difficulties found on those protocols. Third, it presents a problem exploration for key aspects in IP-based vehicular networking, such as IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, Mobility Management, and Security \& Privacy. For each key aspect, this document discusses a problem statement to evaluate the gap between the state-of-the-art techniques and requirements in IP-based vehicular networking.}, }