%% You should probably cite rfc9365 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-27, number = {draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking-27}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipwave-vehicular-networking/27/}, author = {Jaehoon Paul Jeong}, title = {{IPv6 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE): Problem Statement and Use Cases}}, pagetotal = 50, year = 2022, month = feb, day = 23, abstract = {This document discusses the problem statement and use cases of IPv6-based vehicular networking for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The main scenarios of vehicular communications are vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), and vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications. First, this document explains use cases using V2V, V2I, and V2X networking. Next, for IPv6-based vehicular networks, it makes a gap analysis of current IPv6 protocols (e.g., IPv6 Neighbor Discovery, Mobility Management, and Security \& Privacy), and then enumerates requirements for the extensions of those IPv6 protocols for IPv6-based vehicular networking.}, }