Skip to main content

Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions for Advertising Router Information
draft-ietf-isis-caps-07

Yes

(Bill Fenner)

No Objection

(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Bill Fenner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2007-02-02) Unknown
Header line:
 Proposed status: Standard 
should be
 Intended status: Standards Track

Editorial points from Gen-Art review by Francis Dupont:

 - 1 page 2: I know what is IS-IS but a random reader likely doesn't:
  add a reference to the ISO IS (i.e., [IS-IS]) in the first sentence.
  (and perhaps add IS-IS-IP too, cf last comment).
 - 1 page 2: "two" examples numbered from 1 to 3 (:-)!
 - 2 page 3: I don't understand the "to prevent TLV looping" but
  perhaps it is not "TLV" looping?
 - 3 page 3: I don't like the term "domain flooding scope", it seems a
  bit redundant to me.
 - 3 page 4: "stale capabilities information A system"
                                            ^^ ", a "?
 - 9.1 page 6: is ISIS-TE really a normative reference? BTW there is no
   reference in the text (same for the previous item, there is a nice
   checker for this: I suggest to use it...)
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2007-02-05) Unknown
Section 1., paragraph 5:
>    The use of IS-IS for Path Computation Element (PCE) discovery may
>    also be considered and will be discussed in the PCE WG.

  RFCs shouldn't typically discuss what WGs at the time did or didn't
  do. Remove paragraph.
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown