Skip to main content

Recommendations for Interoperable IP Networks using Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS)
draft-ietf-isis-ip-interoperable-02

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2004-05-18
02 Bill Fenner
In Authors' 48 Hours:

From: RFC Editor
Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3787
          NOW AVAILABLE
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 …
In Authors' 48 Hours:

From: RFC Editor
Subject: authors 48 hours: RFC 3787
          NOW AVAILABLE
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:19:03 -0700
To: jparker@axiowave.com
2004-05-18
02 Bill Fenner State Change Notice email list have been change to , , from , ,
2004-05-18
02 Bill Fenner Note field has been cleared by Bill Fenner
2004-04-27
02 Amy Vezza
[Note]: 'Had to separate a ballot set.  The other document has been published as an RFC, but this one is still in the RFC Editor''s …
[Note]: 'Had to separate a ballot set.  The other document has been published as an RFC, but this one is still in the RFC Editor''s Queue.' added by Amy Vezza
2004-04-27
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from RFC Published by Amy Vezza
2004-03-17
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2003-12-17
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2003-12-16
02 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2003-12-16
02 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2003-12-16
02 (System) Last call text was added
2003-12-16
02 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2003-12-15
02 Alex Zinin State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Alex Zinin
2003-12-15
02 Alex Zinin -02 rev addresses the IESG comments, ready to go, sent the message to the secretariat releasing the doc.
2003-12-15
02 Alex Zinin State Change Notice email list have been change to , , from ,
2003-12-10
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-ip-interoperable-02.txt
2003-11-21
02 Alex Zinin
IESG comments (Bert, Thomas):

Nits, applies to both:

- doesn't pass ID-nits: status of this memo and abstract are numbered
- I'd also get rid …
IESG comments (Bert, Thomas):

Nits, applies to both:

- doesn't pass ID-nits: status of this memo and abstract are numbered
- I'd also get rid of that quote in the abstract and put it in the
  introduction
- s/Author's Addresses/Author's Address/


Content issues to iso-interoperable only:
- norm ref to draft-ietf-isis-wg-mib-12.txt, but this has expired. 
  Could create a lock-in, needs to be resolved.

Also both use 2119 language without definitions.
2003-11-21
02 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-11-20 by Amy Vezza
2003-11-20
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2003-11-09
02 Alex Zinin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-11-20 by Alex Zinin
2003-11-09
02 Alex Zinin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Alex Zinin
2003-11-07
02 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2003-10-24
02 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2003-10-24
02 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2003-10-20
02 Alex Zinin State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Alex Zinin
2003-10-20
02 Alex Zinin -01 revs satisfy the comments. Starting the IETF LC.
2003-09-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-ip-interoperable-01.txt
2003-06-17
02 Bill Fenner Intended Status has been changed to Informational from None
2003-04-16
02 Alex Zinin State Changes to AD Evaluation  :: Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Zinin, Alex
2003-03-30
02 Alex Zinin
AD-review comments:

I have one real comment on the two drafts plus some nits.

Security:

> 14. Security Implications

Nit: above should be "Security Considerations" …
AD-review comments:

I have one real comment on the two drafts plus some nits.

Security:

> 14. Security Implications

Nit: above should be "Security Considerations" in both drafts

>    The clarifications in this document do not raise any new security
>    concerns, as there is no change in the underlying protocol described
>    in ISO 10589 [1] and RFC 1195 [2].

Section 6.2 of the IP document essentially deprecates TLV 133 and
tells to use TLV 10 for authentication. This should be mentioned in
this section.

It would also be a good idea to go through every section in both
documents and see if what's described there changes the security
aspects of the protocol, i.e., creates new or removes old attack
possibilities.

I would also remove words saying that the underlying protocol is not
changed.

Nits:

> 2. Abstract

for both docs, the abstract should not have any refs in it. Just
remove "[?]" from it.

> 15. References

You need to specify whether references are normative or informative.
My guess for the IP doc would be that refs 1--5 are normative and [6]
is informative. What you should do is have two sections:

15. Normative References

16. Informative References
2003-03-11
02 Alex Zinin Passed the WG LC. Will review after the SF IETF.
2003-03-11
02 Alex Zinin State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Zinin, Alex
2003-03-11
02 Alex Zinin Draft Added by Zinin, Alex
2002-11-04
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-isis-ip-interoperable-00.txt