Extensions to IS-IS for Layer-2 Systems
draft-ietf-isis-layer2-11

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

Section 2.2., paragraph 2:
>    o  Type: TLV Type, set to MT-PORT-CAP TLV 143 [TBD].

  What's TBD here?

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes

Extraordinarily pedantic nit: MAC address in section 2.1 is not to scale; suggested


   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          MAC (1)    (6 bytes)                 |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                   .................                           |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          MAC (N)    (6 bytes)                 |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes

Please run the nit-checker. There are a few missing and unused references.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

2.2.  Multi Topology aware Port Capability TLV

   o  Topology Identifier: MT ID is a 12-bit field containing the MT ID
      of the topology being announced.  This field when set to zero
      implies that it is being used to carry base topology information.

Excuse my ignorance, but is this description actually sufficient for interoperability? Which values are valid here and where are they coming from?


Also I don't think specifying exact values before they are assigned by IANA is a good idea.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

  Please consider the editorial comments in the Gen-ART Review by
  Kathleen Moriarty on 19- Jan-2011.

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection