IS-IS Registry Extension for Purges
draft-ietf-isis-reg-purge-01
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
Agree with Dan that this document should be on a telechat AFTER it passes IETF last call (unless this is urgent in some way?) Section 4., paragraph 1: > This document requests that IANA modify the IS-IS 'TLV Codepoints > Registry' by adding a column in the registry for 'Purge'. A 'y' in > this column indicates that the TLV for this row MAY be found in a > purge. A 'n' in this column indicates that the TLV for this row MUST > NOT be found in a purge. It would be slightly more self-explanatory if the registry column was titled "Allowed in Purge".
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
I have no objection with approving the document as it stands right now but I observe that there is an IETF Last Call running for it and lasting six days after the IESG telechat date. I suggest that any approval be conditional, and in case substantial comments are submitted as Last Call comments after the IESG telechat they are brought to the attention of the IESG.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
Some comments from Ari Keränen who helped me in some of my reviews: This document updates 3 RFCs, should say that in the abstract. Also LSP acronym should be expanded.
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
I cleared my DISCUSS.
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection