Advertising Seamless Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (S-BFD) Discriminators in IS-IS
draft-ietf-isis-sbfd-discriminator-02
Yes
(Alia Atlas)
No Objection
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Brian Haberman)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
Yes
Yes
(2016-03-24)
Unknown
The BFD WG has come to consensus on the path forward resulting in the requirement to know about discriminators assigned, and not explicit mapping to individual functions. The base S-BFD document (draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base) has been updated appropriately. I'm clearing my DISCUSS.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2015-11-19)
Unknown
Thanks for writing this clear document. I do agree with Alvaro's issue, however.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-17)
Unknown
Please expand S-BFD, both in the abstract and the body. (I see an expansion of BFD in the body, but not one for S-BFD)
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-18)
Unknown
As mentioned by Menachem in his OPS DIR review:
NITS
====
The NITS Tool founds the following warnings:
== The document seems to contain a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but was
first submitted on or after 10 November 2008. The disclaimer is usually
necessary only for documents that revise or obsolete older RFCs, and that
take significant amounts of text from those RFCs. If you can contact all
authors of the source material and they are willing to grant the BCP78
rights to the IETF Trust, you can and should remove the disclaimer.
Otherwise, the disclaimer is needed and you can ignore this comment.
(See the Legal Provisions document at
http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info for more information.)
== Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of
draft-ietf-bfd-seamless-base-04
-----------------------------------------
In addition the following sentence may need clarification:
"When multiple S-BFD discriminators are advertised how a given discriminator is mapped to a specific use case is out of scope for this document."
It was not clear to me whether this is defined or will be defined in a different document or whether this is left open for each implementation.
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-18)
Unknown
Nevil Brownlee performed the opsdir review.
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown