%% You should probably cite rfc8667 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-19, number = {draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-19}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/19/}, author = {Stefano Previdi and Les Ginsberg and Clarence Filsfils and Ahmed Bashandy and Hannes Gredler and Stephane Litkowski and Bruno Decraene and Jeff Tantsura}, title = {{IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing}}, pagetotal = 35, year = , month = , day = , abstract = {Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of topological sub-paths, called "segments". These segments are advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF). This draft describes the necessary IS-IS extensions that need to be introduced for Segment Routing operating on an MPLS data-plane.}, }