Skip to main content

Clarifications and Extensions to the Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSS-API) for the Use of Channel Bindings
draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-channel-bindings-07

Yes

(Tim Polk)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Lars Eggert)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)

Recuse


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Tim Polk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2009-04-06) Unknown
Support Lars discuss
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2009-04-06) Unknown
  Based on the response from the author to Brian Carpenter's Gen-ART
  Review, I was expecting this paragraph to be revised:
  >
  > Where a language binding of the GSS-API models channel bindings as
  > OCTET STRINGs (or the language's equivalent), then the implementation
  > MUST assume that the given bindings correspond only to the
  > application-data field of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS as shown above, rather
  > than some encoding of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS.
  >
  The expected update would be something like this:
  >
  > Where the language binding of the GSS-API model's channel bindings is
  > a single OCTET STRING (or the language's equivalent), then the
  > implementation SHOULD assume that the given bindings correspond only
  > to the application-data field of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS shown above.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse (2009-03-26) Unknown
I was a WG chair for Kitten at the time of the publication request and were involved in discussions about it.