Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 9 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
I was a WG chair for Kitten at the time of the publication request and were
involved in discussions about it.
Support Lars discuss
Based on the response from the author to Brian Carpenter's Gen-ART
Review, I was expecting this paragraph to be revised:
> Where a language binding of the GSS-API models channel bindings as
> OCTET STRINGs (or the language's equivalent), then the implementation
> MUST assume that the given bindings correspond only to the
> application-data field of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS as shown above, rather
> than some encoding of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS.
The expected update would be something like this:
> Where the language binding of the GSS-API model's channel bindings is
> a single OCTET STRING (or the language's equivalent), then the
> implementation SHOULD assume that the given bindings correspond only
> to the application-data field of GSS-CHANNEL-BINDINGS shown above.