Generic Security Service API Version 2: Java Bindings Update
draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-07

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Eric Rescorla Yes

Alia Atlas No Objection

Deborah Brungard No Objection

Ben Campbell No Objection

Comment (2018-01-23 for -06)
I support Alissa's discuss position. 5653 had  the 2119 boilerplate, but no upper-case keywords. IIUC, the authors removed the boilerplate because of that. But keep in mind moving to the 8174 boilerplate is not a drop-in replacement.

Benoit Claise No Objection

Alissa Cooper (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2018-01-24 for -06)
Thanks for answering my DISCUSS question.

Spencer Dawkins No Objection

Suresh Krishnan No Objection

Warren Kumari No Objection

Mirja K├╝hlewind No Objection

Terry Manderson No Objection

Kathleen Moriarty No Objection

Alvaro Retana No Objection

Adam Roach No Objection

Comment (2018-01-24 for -06)
I have reviewed only the deltas from RFC5653, and am balloting No Objection based on this diff:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06&url1=https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5653.txt