A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network
draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-03

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (l2vpn WG)
Authors Raymond Key  , Simon DeLord  , Frederic JOUNAY  , Lucy Yong  , Lizhong Jin  , Yuji Kamite  , Wim Henderickx 
Last updated 2013-09-06
Replaces draft-key-l2vpn-etree-frwk
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats pdf htmlized (tools) htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd None
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
Network Working Group                               Raymond Key (editor)
Internet Draft                                     Simon Delord, Telstra
Category: Informational                       Frederic Jounay, Orange CH
Expires: March 2014                                    Lucy Yong, Huawei
                                                             Lizhong Jin
                                         Yuji Kamite, NTT Communications
                                          Wim Henderickx, Alcatel-Lucent

                                                       September 6, 2013

            A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network
                     draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk-03

Status of this Memo 
 
   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the 
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. 
 
   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering 
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that 
   other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- 
   Drafts. 
 
   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months 
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any 
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference 
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." 
 
   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. 
 
   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at 
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. 
 
   This Internet-Draft will expire on March 6, 2014. 

Abstract
    
   This document proposes a solution framework for supporting Metro 
   Ethernet Forum (MEF) Ethernet Tree (E-Tree) services over a 
   Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) network. The objective is to 
   provide a simple and effective approach to emulate E-Tree services 
   in addition to Ethernet LAN (E-LAN) services on an existing MPLS 
   network.

Key, et al.               Expires March 2014                  [Page 1]
Internet Draft         Framework E-Tree over MPLS         September 2013

Table of Contents
   
   1. Introduction....................................................3
   1.1. Objective and Scope...........................................3
   1.2. Traditional Ethernet Network..................................3
   1.3. MEF Multipoint Ethernet Services..............................3
   1.3.1. Similarity between E-LAN and E-Tree.........................4
   1.3.2. Difference between E-LAN and E-Tree.........................4
   1.4. IETF Multipoint L2VPN Services................................5
   1.4.1. Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS)..........................5
   1.4.2. Virtual Private Multicast Service (VPMS)....................5
   1.4.3. Ethernet VPN (E-VPN)........................................6
   1.5. Terminology...................................................6
   2. Reference Model.................................................6
   3. Use Cases.......................................................8
   4. Challenges......................................................9
   4.1. Generic E-Tree Service Definition.............................9
   4.1.1. Mandatory Leaf-to-Leaf Communication Restriction............9
   4.2. Use Case Desirable Requirements..............................10
   4.2.1. Ethernet Broadcast/Multicast Optimisation..................10
   4.2.2. IP Multicast Optimisation..................................11
   4.2.3. MAC-based Forwarding Unnecessary...........................11
   4.2.4. MAC-based Forwarding Security Concern......................12
   5. A Solution Framework for MAC-based Forwarding E-Tree...........12
   5.1. VPLS Solution................................................12
   5.1.1. MAC-based Forwarding Any-to-Any Ethernet VPN...............12
   5.1.2. Leaf-to-Leaf Communication Restriction.....................13
   5.1.3. Optional Enhancement - Point-to-Multipoint PW..............13
   5.1.4. Optional Enhancement - IP Multicast in VPLS........ .......14
   5.2. E-VPN Solution...............................................14
   6. Non-MAC-based Forwarding E-Tree................................14
   6.1. Single Root, Broadcast Only - VPMS...........................14
   6.2. Multiple Roots, Broadcast and Unicast........................14
   6.3. E-VPN Solution...............................................15
   7. Security Consideration.........................................15
   8. IANA Considerations............................................15
   9. Acknowledgements...............................................15
   10. References....................................................15
   10.1. Normative References........................................15
   10.2. Informative References......................................16
   Appendix A. Some Possible Ways for Leaf-to-Leaf Communication
Show full document text