Skip to main content

An Architecture for Provider Provisioned CE-based Virtual Private Networks using IPsec
draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-03

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>,
    RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, 
    l3vpn mailing list <l3vpn@ietf.org>, 
    l3vpn chair <l3vpn-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Document Action: 'An Architecture for Provider 
         Provisioned CE-based Virtual Private Networks using IPsec' to 
         Informational RFC 

The IESG has approved the following documents:

- 'An Architecture for Provider Provisioned CE-based Virtual Private 
   Networks using IPsec '
   <draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-04.txt> as an Informational RFC
- 'Applicability Statement for Provider Provisioned CE-based Virtual 
   Private Networks using IPsec '
   <draft-declercq-l3vpn-ce-based-as-01.txt> as an Informational RFC

These documents are products of the Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks 
Working Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Mark Townsley and Ross Callon.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l3vpn-ce-based-04.txt

Ballot Text

Technical Summary

This informational document describes how a service provider can
supply VPN services using provider-provisioned CE-based devices
which make use of IPsec for tunneling across the provider network
between the CE based devices.

Working Group Summary

These documents were a product of first the PPVPN WG, and later the L3VPN
WG. They passed WG Last Call, but have not been actively discussed in the
WG for some time. There is little interest to work on CE-based VPN
problems within the WG today. The L3VPN WG is being rechartered to reflect
this, and these documents are being advanced as Informational for the
historical record.

The chairs reported that there were no WG conflicts regarding this draft.



Protocol Quality

This document was reviewed by Ross Callon and Mark Townsley.

RFC Editor Note