Traces of EDHOC
draft-ietf-lake-traces-09
Yes
(Paul Wouters)
No Objection
Jim Guichard
(Andrew Alston)
(Erik Kline)
(Francesca Palombini)
(John Scudder)
(Robert Wilton)
(Warren Kumari)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment
(2023-09-15 for -07)
Sent
Thank you for writing this document. I am confident that it will help future implementers. I did not personally verify the encodings. ** Section 1.1 The traces in this draft are valid for version -22 of [I-D.ietf-lake-edhoc]. The traces has been verified by two independent implementations. I appreciate the precision of this statement. In the long term, shouldn’t these traces be valid for whatever RFC this EDHOC becomes. Recommend providing instructions to the RFC Editor to replace [I-D.ietf-lake-edhoc] with the yet-to-be-assigned RFC number.
Paul Wouters Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -07)
Unknown
Andrew Alston Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
Erik Kline Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
Francesca Palombini Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
John Scudder Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
Murray Kucherawy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2023-09-20 for -07)
Sent
I don't think you want BCP 14 here. The solitary "MUST" you do have is actually citing another document; this one is Informational and not actually stating any of its own requirements. I'd suggest removing the BCP 14 references and the matching boilerplate, but quote the "MUST" or even just say that document "requires" (lowercase) something specific.
Robert Wilton Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
Warren Kumari Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -07)
Not sent
Zaheduzzaman Sarker Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2023-09-20 for -07)
Not sent
Haven't found TSV related issues or have not TSV related comments.