%% You should probably cite rfc9480 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-08, number = {draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-08}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates/08/}, author = {Hendrik Brockhaus and David von Oheimb}, title = {{Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) Updates}}, pagetotal = 52, year = 2021, month = feb, day = 22, abstract = {This document contains a set of updates to the syntax and transport of Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) version 2. This document updates RFC 4210 and RFC 6712. The aspects of CMP updated in this document are using EnvelopedData instead of EncryptedValue, adding new general message types, defining extended key usages to identify certificates of CMP endpoints on certification and registration authorities, and adding an HTTP URI discovery mechanism and extending the URI structure. To properly differentiate the support of EnvelopedData instead of EncryptedValue, the CMP version 3 is introduced in case a transaction is supposed to use EnvelopedData.}, }