%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection-20 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-lamps-header-protection-09,
    number =    {draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection-09},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-header-protection/09/},
    author =    {Daniel Kahn Gillmor and Bernie Hoeneisen and Alexey Melnikov},
    title =     {{Header Protection for S/MIME}},
    pagetotal = 176,
    year =      2022,
    month =     nov,
    day =       23,
    abstract =  {S/MIME version 3.1 introduced a mechanism to provide end-to-end cryptographic protection of e-mail message headers. However, few implementations generate messages using this mechanism, and several legacy implementations have revealed rendering or security issues when handling such a message. This document updates the S/MIME specification to offer a different mechanism that provides the same cryptographic protections but with fewer downsides when handled by legacy clients. Furthermore, it offers more explicit guidance for clients when generating or handling e-mail messages with cryptographic protection of message headers.},
}